Paper · 1991 · Weed Research

Orobanche ramosa L. (broomrape) control in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) with chlorsulfuron, glyphosate and imazaquin

E. KOTOULA‐SYKA; I. G. ELEFTHEROHORINOS

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary: Chlorsulfuron, giyphosate and imazaquin were evaluated in pot and field studies for their efficacy in controlling broomrape ( Orobanche ramosa L.) in tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in Northern Greece. All herbicides were applied four to five weeks after tomato transplanting, when the crop was at early flowering stage and broomrape had started to develop underground attachments. The number of emerged broomrape shoots and underground attachments were less affected by herbicide treatments than the dry weight, suggesting that the herbicides suppress the growth of broomrape rather than kill its underground organs. In the pot experiments, chlorsulfuron applied at 5 g AI ha −1 was the most effective treatment for broomrape control and the least toxic to the crop. Imazaquin and glyphosate applied at 37 and 180 g AI ha −1 , respectively, controlled broomrape but imazaquin reduced crop yield. In the field, similar rates of glyphosate and higher rates of imazaquin were not toxic to the crop but were less effective on broomrape. Chlorsulfuron applied at 10 g AI ha −1 controlled broomrape emergence by 88%. When the herbicide was applied twice (5+10 g AI ha −1 ), it gave complete control of broomrape but delayed crop maturity. The yield of tomato was not increased as a result of these treatments because of low broomrape infestation and a short competition period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides affected broomrape dry weight more than shoots or attachments.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
less affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of emerged broomrape shoots and underground attachments were less affected by herbicide treatments than the dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer herbicides suppress broomrape growth rather than kill underground organs.

Treatment
herbicidese0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
growth of broomrapee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that the herbicides suppress the growth of broomrape rather than kill its underground organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot chlorsulfuron at 5 g AI ha −1 was most effective against broomrape.

Treatment
chlorsulfuron applied at 5 g AI ha −1e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape controle0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the pot experiments, chlorsulfuron applied at 5 g AI ha −1 was the most effective treatment for broomrape control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot chlorsulfuron was least toxic to tomato.

Treatment
chlorsulfuron applied at 5 g AI ha −1e0
Outcome
toxic to the crope0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorsulfuron applied at 5 g AI ha −1 was the most effective treatment for broomrape control and the least toxic to the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazaquin controlled broomrape at 37 g AI ha −1.

Treatment
Imazaquine0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
controlled broomrapee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazaquin and glyphosate applied at 37 and 180 g AI ha −1 , respectively, controlled broomrape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate controlled broomrape at 180 g AI ha −1.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
controlled broomrapee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazaquin and glyphosate applied at 37 and 180 g AI ha −1 , respectively, controlled broomrape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazaquin reduced tomato yield.

Treatment
imazaquine0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazaquin reduced crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field glyphosate at similar rates was not toxic to tomato.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
toxic to the crope0
Direction
not toxice0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, similar rates of glyphosate and higher rates of imazaquin were not toxic to the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field imazaquin at higher rates was not toxic to tomato.

Treatment
imazaquine0
Outcome
toxic to the crope0
Direction
not toxice0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, similar rates of glyphosate and higher rates of imazaquin were not toxic to the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field glyphosate was less effective against broomrape.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrapee0
Direction
less effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar rates of glyphosate and higher rates of imazaquin were not toxic to the crop but were less effective on broomrape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field imazaquin was less effective against broomrape.

Treatment
imazaquine0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrapee0
Direction
less effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar rates of glyphosate and higher rates of imazaquin were not toxic to the crop but were less effective on broomrape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorsulfuron at 10 g AI ha −1 controlled broomrape emergence by 88%.

Treatment
Chlorsulfuron applied at 10 g AI ha −1e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape emergencee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorsulfuron applied at 10 g AI ha −1 controlled broomrape emergence by 88%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-applied chlorsulfuron completely controlled broomrape.

Treatment
herbicide was applied twice (5+10 g AI ha −1 )e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
control of broomrapee0
Direction
completee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the herbicide was applied twice (5+10 g AI ha −1 ), it gave complete control of broomrape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorsulfuron applied at 10 g AI ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-applied chlorsulfuron delayed tomato maturity.

Treatment
herbicide was applied twice (5+10 g AI ha −1 )e0
Outcome
crop maturitye0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the herbicide was applied twice (5+10 g AI ha −1 ), it gave complete control of broomrape but delayed crop maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorsulfuron applied at 10 g AI ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide treatments did not increase tomato yield under low broomrape infestation.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
yield of tomatoe0
Direction
not increasede0
Qualifier
low broomrape infestation and a short competition periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of tomato was not increased as a result of these treatments because of low broomrape infestation and a short competition period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1389 · show in text ↑

herbicide · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

herbicide · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.