Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Comparing dry farming of tomatoes across varieties and soil management history

Alison R. Gill; Coleman Rainey; Yvonne Socolar; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Farmers faced with increasingly limited access to freshwater for irrigation are utilizing dry farming techniques to produce fruit, vegetable, and grain crops. Defined as crop production during a dry season using little or no irrigation, dry farming relies on water stored in the soil and requires specialized soil management, healthy soil biology, and careful selection of crop varieties. We investigated these three factors in a dry-farmed tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) field trial with three indeterminate varieties (Early Girl, Momotaro, and Zapotec) and two determinate genotypes (76R and rmc ), the latter serving as a model system for studying the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. While five prior years of contrasting surface tillage practices changed soil properties, they did not affect marketable tomato yields or quality, nor affect plant physiology, including plant water use efficiency [intrinsic (WUE i ) and long-term (δ 13 C)], gas exchange, stem water potential (Ψ stem ), and leaf relative water content (RWC). Early Girl produced a greater number of fruits and fewer non-marketable fruits than Momotaro and Zapotec. Although AM fungi root colonization was very low for both wildtype mycorrhizal genotype 76R and its reduced mycorrhizal mutant rmc , it differed significantly depending on genotype and tillage treatment. 76R produced slightly greater marketable fruit, but physiological responses did not differ significantly between genotypes. This study does not provide field-based evidence that soil chemical and biological changes resulting from no-till influence dry-farmed tomato productivity, while genotype had a clear impact on tomato yield and quality. Field-scale tillage experiments may better capture soil physical changes that affect water availability, especially at depth, and should be examined.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contrasting prior surface tillage changed soil properties.

Treatment
contrasting surface tillage practicese0
Outcome
soil propertiese0
Direction
changede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five prior years of contrasting surface tillage practices changed soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contrasting prior tillage did not affect marketable tomato yield or quality.

Treatment
contrasting surface tillage practicese0
Outcome
marketable tomato yields or qualitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five prior years of contrasting surface tillage practices changed soil properties, they did not affect marketable tomato yields or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contrasting prior tillage did not affect tomato water status or gas exchange measures.

Treatment
contrasting surface tillage practicese1
Outcome
plant water use efficiency [intrinsic (WUE i ) and long-term (δ 13 C)], gas exchange, stem water potential (Ψ stem ), and leaf relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
nor affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor affect plant physiology, including plant water use efficiency [intrinsic (WUE i ) and long-term (δ 13 C)], gas exchange, stem water potential (Ψ stem ), and leaf relative water content (RWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“five prior years of contrasting surface tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early Girl produced more fruits than Momotaro and Zapotec.

Material
Early Girle0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Momotaro and Zapotece0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early Girl produced a greater number of fruits and fewer non-marketable fruits than Momotaro and Zapotec”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early Girl produced fewer non-marketable fruits than Momotaro and Zapotec.

Material
Early Girle0
Outcome
non-marketable fruitse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
Momotaro and Zapotece0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early Girl produced a greater number of fruits and fewer non-marketable fruits than Momotaro and Zapotec”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungal root colonization was very low in genotype 76R.

Material
76Re0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
AM fungi root colonizatione0
Direction
very lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM fungi root colonization was very low for both wildtype mycorrhizal genotype 76R and its reduced mycorrhizal mutant rmc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungal root colonization was very low in mutant rmc.

Material
rmce0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
AM fungi root colonizatione0
Direction
very lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM fungi root colonization was very low for both wildtype mycorrhizal genotype 76R and its reduced mycorrhizal mutant rmc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–472 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungal root colonization differed significantly by genotype and tillage.

Treatment
tillage treatmente0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
AM fungi root colonizatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it differed significantly depending on genotype and tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM fungi root colonization was very low for both wildtype mycorrhizal genotype 76R and its reduced mycorrhizal mutant rmc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1277 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype 76R produced slightly more marketable fruit than rmc.

Material
76Re0
Outcome
marketable fruite0
Direction
slightly greatere0
Comparator
rmce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“76R produced slightly greater marketable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1397 · show in text ↑
e1

“genotype 76R and its reduced mycorrhizal mutant rmc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1277 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological responses did not differ significantly between genotypes.

Outcome
physiological responsese0
Direction
did not differe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“physiological responses did not differ significantly between genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1473 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–472 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Field-scale tillage experiments should examine soil physical changes affecting water availability at depth.

Outcome
Field-scale tillage experiments may better capture soil physical changes that affect water availability, especially at depth, and should be examinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field-scale tillage experiments may better capture soil physical changes that affect water availability, especially at depth, and should be examined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1843 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.