Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Mitigation of drought stress effects on wheat yield via the foliar application of boron, zinc, and manganese nano-chelates and supplementary irrigation

Saman Moitazedi; Saeed Sayfzadeh; Reza Haghparast; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the foliar application of B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelates in separate and combined forms and determine what level of nano-chelates fertilizer treatment most significantly enhances the grain yield of wheat (Azar-2 cultivar) under rainfed and supplementary irrigation conditions. The experiment was performed as a split-plot experiment with three replications in two crop years (2014–2015). The main plot included two irrigation regimes ((I1) rainfed irrigation and (I2) supplementary irrigation) during two stages of development (spike emergence and grain filling). The sub-plot had eight foliar application levels: B, Zn, Mn, B + Zn, B + Mn, Zn + Mn, B + Zn + Mn, and distilled water (control). The foliar application of B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelates combined with supplementary irrigation or its sole application dramatically increased wheat’s resistance to drought stress. Thousand kernel weight and the number of kernels per spike play a decisive role in grain yield. Therefore, the foliar application of nano-fertilizers can increase grain yield by improving these components. The highest grain yield (2528.33 kg/ha−1) was obtained in the supplementary irrigation condition after the combined foliar application of B + Mn + Zn nano-chelates. This condition led to a 41% increase compared to the highest grain yield obtained under rainfed conditions after the foliar application of Zn nano-chelates (1490 kg/ha−1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelates with supplementary irrigation increased wheat drought resistance.

Treatment
foliar application of B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelates combined with supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
resistance to drought stresse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelates combined with supplementary irrigation or its sole application dramatically increased wheat’s resistance to drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole foliar application of B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelates increased wheat drought resistance.

Treatment
foliar application of B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelatese0
Outcome
resistance to drought stresse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of B, Zn, and Mn nano-chelates combined with supplementary irrigation or its sole application dramatically increased wheat’s resistance to drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–919 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand kernel weight and kernels per spike play a decisive role in wheat grain yield.

Organ / stage
spikee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
Thousand kernel weight and the number of kernels per spikee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thousand kernel weight and the number of kernels per spike play a decisive role in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude foliar nano-fertilizers can increase grain yield by improving these components.

Treatment
foliar application of nano-fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
improving these componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of nano-fertilizers can increase grain yield by improving these components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary irrigation with B + Mn + Zn nano-chelates gave the highest grain yield of 2528.33 kg/ha−1.

Treatment
supplementary irrigation condition after the combined foliar application of B + Mn + Zn nano-chelatese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2528.33 kg/ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (2528.33 kg/ha−1) was obtained in the supplementary irrigation condition after the combined foliar application of B + Mn + Zn nano-chelates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That combined treatment raised yield by 41% relative to rainfed Zn nano-chelate application, whose yield was 1490 kg/ha−1.

Treatment
This conditione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
41%e0
Qualifier
1490 kg/ha−1e0
Comparator
rainfed conditions after the foliar application of Zn nano-chelatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This condition led to a 41% increase compared to the highest grain yield obtained under rainfed conditions after the foliar application of Zn nano-chelates (1490 kg/ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

manganese atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.