Paper · 2008 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Inorganic Fertilizer Inputs on Grain Yields and Soil Properties in a Long‐Term Wheat–Corn Cropping System in South China

Huimin Zhang; Boren Wang; Minggang Xu

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
69
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A long‐term double cropping wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and corn (Zea mays L.) experiment was conducted at Qiyang, Hunan, China, to study the effects of inorganic fertilizers on grain yields and soil properties and to identify the possible causes of yield trends. Six treatments of unfertilized control, N, NP, NK, PK, and NPK were included. The treatments (N, NP, NK, and NPK) where inorganic nitrogen (N) was added showed significant (P<0.05) yield declines of 76 to 114 kg ha−1 yr−1 for wheat and 94 to 260 kg ha−1 yr−1 for corn, respectively, except for corn yield in the NPK treatment in which the decline was not significant during a 15‐yr (1990–2005) period. Comparatively, the decline amounts in corn were much higher than in wheat. The yields of wheat and corn remained unchanged in the PK treatment. The total organic carbon (C), total N, phosphorus (P), and available P, potassium (K), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) contents of soil were either increased or decreased during the study period. Both the decreases of exchangeable calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+) and increases of exchangeable hydrogen (H+) and Al3+ contents of soil in the treatments where inorganic N was applied were significant (P<0.05). The same four treatments showed significant pH declines ranging from 0.07 to 0.12 yr−1. Several lines of evidence point to decline of soil pH due to inorganic N fertilizer added as leading to the overall yield decline of wheat and corn. However, the yields of both crops increased significantly after lime application. In the long term, the farmers should be encouraged to use adequate lime based on a balanced approach to ensure sustainable productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer treatments showed significant annual wheat yield declines of 76 to 114 kg ha−1 yr−1.

Treatment
N, NP, NK, and NPKe0
Outcome
yield declinese0
Direction
declinese0
Value
76 to 114 kg ha−1 yr−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments (N, NP, NK, and NPK) where inorganic nitrogen (N) was added showed significant (P<0.05) yield declines of 76 to 114 kg ha−1 yr−1 for wheat and 94 to 260 kg ha−1 yr−1 for corn, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–555 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer treatments showed annual corn yield declines of 94 to 260 kg ha−1 yr−1, except for nonsignificant decline under NPK.

Treatment
N, NP, NK, and NPKe2
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
declinee0
Value
94 to 260 kg ha−1 yr−1e0
Qualifier
except for corn yield in the NPK treatment in which the decline was not significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“94 to 260 kg ha−1 yr−1 for corn, respectively, except for corn yield in the NPK treatment in which the decline was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“N, NP, NK, and NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–386 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield declines were greater than wheat yield declines.

Outcome
decline amounts in corne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decline amounts in corn were much higher than in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield remained unchanged under PK treatment.

Treatment
PK treatmente0
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
remained unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of wheat and corn remained unchanged in the PK treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield remained unchanged under PK treatment.

Treatment
PK treatmente0
Outcome
corne0
Direction
remained unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of wheat and corn remained unchanged in the PK treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrient and organic carbon contents changed during the study period.

Outcome
contents of soile0
Qualifier
either increased or decreasede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total organic carbon (C), total N, phosphorus (P), and available P, potassium (K), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) contents of soil were either increased or decreased during the study period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable soil calcium and magnesium declined significantly under inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
inorganic Ne0
Outcome
exchangeable calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+)e0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the decreases of exchangeable calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+) and increases of exchangeable hydrogen (H+) and Al3+ contents of soil in the treatments where inorganic N was applied were significant (P<0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable soil hydrogen and aluminum increased significantly under inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
inorganic Ne0
Outcome
exchangeable hydrogen (H+) and Al3+ contents of soile0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the decreases of exchangeable calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+) and increases of exchangeable hydrogen (H+) and Al3+ contents of soil in the treatments where inorganic N was applied were significant (P<0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH declined significantly by 0.07 to 0.12 yr−1 under inorganic nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
inorganic Ne1
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
declinese0
Value
0.07 to 0.12 yr−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same four treatments showed significant pH declines ranging from 0.07 to 0.12 yr−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1314 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic N was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1199 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–65 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute overall wheat and corn yield declines to soil acidification from inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
inorganic N fertilizere0
Outcome
overall yield decline of wheat and corne0
Qualifier
decline of soil pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Several lines of evidence point to decline of soil pH due to inorganic N fertilizer added as leading to the overall yield decline of wheat and corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application significantly increased wheat yields.

Treatment
lime applicatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yields of both crops increased significantly after lime application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1545 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application significantly increased corn yields.

Treatment
lime applicatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yields of both crops increased significantly after lime application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1545 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adequate lime for sustainable crop productivity.

Outcome
use adequate limee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the farmers should be encouraged to use adequate lime based on a balanced approach to ensure sustainable productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat–Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–100 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 215 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

229 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 242 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.