Paper · 2021 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Silicon-based induced resistance in maize against fall armyworm [Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)]

Inzamam Ul Haq; Aroosa Khurshid; Rehan Inayat; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) is a major economic pest in the United States and has recently become a significant concern in African and Asian countries. Due to its increased resistance to current management strategies, including pesticides and transgenic corn, alternative management techniques have become more necessary. Currently, silicon (Si) is being used in many pest control systems due to its ability to increase plant resistance to biotic and abiotic factors and promote plant growth. The current experiments were carried out at the College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, to test the effect of Si on lifetable parameters and lipase activity of fall armyworm and vegetative and physiological parameters of maize plants. Two sources of Si (silicon dioxide: SiO2 and potassium silicate: K2SiO3) were applied on maize plants with two application methods (foliar application and soil drenching). The experiment results revealed that foliar applications of SiO2 and K2SiO3 significantly (P≤0.05) increased mortality percentage and developmental period and decreased larval and pupal biomass of fall armyworm. Similarly, both Si sources significantly (P≤0.05) reduced lipase activity of larvae, and fecundity of adults, whereas prolonged longevity of adults. Among plant parameters, a significant increase in fresh and dry weight of shoot, stem length, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant activity was observed with foliar applications of Si. Root fresh and dry weight was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher in plants treated with soil drenching of SiO2 and K2SiO3. Moreover, SiO2 performed better for all parameters as compared to K2SiO3 and control treatment. The study conclusively demonstrated a significant negative effect on various biological parameters of fall armyworm when plants were treated with Si, so it can be a promising strategy to control this pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon sources increased fall armyworm mortality percentage on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar applications of SiO2 and K2SiO3e0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
mortality percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar applications of SiO2 and K2SiO3 significantly (P≤0.05) increased mortality percentage and developmental period and decreased larval and pupal biomass of fall armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon sources increased fall armyworm developmental period on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar applications of SiO2 and K2SiO3e0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
developmental periode0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar applications of SiO2 and K2SiO3 significantly (P≤0.05) increased mortality percentage and developmental period and decreased larval and pupal biomass of fall armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon sources decreased fall armyworm larval and pupal biomass of fall armyworm on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar applications of SiO2 and K2SiO3e0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval and pupal biomass of fall armyworme0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar applications of SiO2 and K2SiO3 significantly (P≤0.05) increased mortality percentage and developmental period and decreased larval and pupal biomass of fall armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both silicon sources reduced fall armyworm lipase activity of larvae.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
both Si sourcese0
Outcome
lipase activity of larvaee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Si sources significantly (P≤0.05) reduced lipase activity of larvae, and fecundity of adults, whereas prolonged longevity of adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both silicon sources reduced fall armyworm fecundity of adults.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
both Si sourcese0
Outcome
fecundity of adultse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Si sources significantly (P≤0.05) reduced lipase activity of larvae, and fecundity of adults, whereas prolonged longevity of adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both silicon sources prolonged fall armyworm longevity of adults.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
both Si sourcese0
Outcome
longevity of adultse0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Si sources significantly (P≤0.05) reduced lipase activity of larvae, and fecundity of adults, whereas prolonged longevity of adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon increased maize fresh and dry weight of shoot, stem length.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar applications of Sie0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of shoot, stem lengthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in fresh and dry weight of shoot, stem length, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant activity was observed with foliar applications of Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon increased maize chlorophyll content, and antioxidant activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar applications of Sie0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in fresh and dry weight of shoot, stem length, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant activity was observed with foliar applications of Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil drenching with either silicon source increased maize root fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
soil drenching of SiO2 and K2SiO3e0
Outcome
Root fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root fresh and dry weight was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher in plants treated with soil drenching of SiO2 and K2SiO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1614 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 performed better across assessed parameters than K2SiO3 and the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SiO2e0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
K2SiO3 and control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO2 performed better for all parameters as compared to K2SiO3 and control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

silicon atom · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: enzyme activity · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon dioxide · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon dioxide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 84 positive, 5 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.