Abstract
The effects of silicon (Si) supply (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mM Si) on maize seedling growth, Si and Cd accumulation, and thiol peptide synthesis under Cd stress conditions were studied. The addition of Si to the growth medium resulted in the significantly higher Si accumulation in plant tissues. The average values of growth parameters (root and shoot fresh weights and root net elongation rates) showed a beneficial role of Si on growth of non-Cd-treated plants, while there was no evidence that silicon mitigated Cd toxicity in maize seedlings. Cadmium exposure depressed plant growth and induced phytochelatin (PC) synthesis. The accumulation of Cd and PCs in roots significantly decreased with increasing Si concentrations in the nutrient solution; however, their accumulation in shoots was not changed in the presence of Si.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon addition significantly increased silicon accumulation in maize tissues.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The addition of Si to the growth medium resulted in the significantly higher Si accumulation in plant tissues”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon benefited maize root and shoot fresh weights and root elongation without cadmium treatment.
- Treatment
- Sie0
- Outcome
- root and shoot fresh weights and root net elongation ratese0
- Direction
- beneficiale0
- Qualifier
- non-Cd-treated plantse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The average values of growth parameters (root and shoot fresh weights and root net elongation rates) showed a beneficial role of Si on growth of non-Cd-treated plants”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
There was no evidence that silicon mitigated cadmium toxicity in maize seedlings.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there was no evidence that silicon mitigated Cd toxicity in maize seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium exposure depressed maize plant growth.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cadmium exposure depressed plant growth and induced phytochelatin (PC) synthesis”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium exposure induced phytochelatin synthesis in maize.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cadmium exposure depressed plant growth and induced phytochelatin (PC) synthesis”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing silicon significantly decreased cadmium and phytochelatin accumulation in maize roots.
- Treatment
- increasing Si concentrationse0
- Outcome
- accumulation of Cd and PCs in rootse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The accumulation of Cd and PCs in roots significantly decreased with increasing Si concentrations in the nutrient solution”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon did not change cadmium and phytochelatin accumulation in maize shoots.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“their accumulation in shoots was not changed in the presence of Si”
t0“maize”
The same questions in other papers
silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →silicon atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →silicon atom · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →silicon atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →heavy metal · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →heavy metal · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.