Paper · 2020 · Alexandria Journal of Soil and Water Sciences/Alexandria Journal of Soil and Water Sciences

Salt Stress of Jeursalim Artichoke Plants in Relation to The Pre-soaking Tubers with Hydrogen Peroxide

Nashwa Abo El-Fadel; Mona Attia

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two main experiments were carried out during the growing seasons 2018 and 2019 on Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau at the Soil Salinity Laboratory Research, Agricultural Research Center, Alexandria, Egypt. This investigation is being proposed to assess the advantages of H2O2-soaked tubers and salt stress exposure on growth, yield components, quality and tubers' elemental composition. Tubers were planted in cemented-butaminzed lysimeters (2*2*1m) in rows, 80 cm in wide and 2 m in length. The treatments were comprised of two variables in split-plot design with three replicates. Four levels of saline irrigation water were prepared by mixing the fresh tap and sea waters, to create salt concentrations of 500 (control), 2000, 3500 and 5000mg/L, then, were arranged in the main plots. Whereas, three levels of H2O2 – soaking tubers before planting (control, 100 and 200mM) were arranged in the sub plots. The H2O2- treated tubers were seeded in the cemented lysimeters, in rows of 80cm in width, 2m in length. At the flowering growth stage, characteristics of vegetative growth were registered and finally at the harvest stage, yield, yield components and quality as well as the elemental tubers composition, including N, P and K% were recorded. The results showed that increasing the salinity levels of irrigation water up to 5000 mg/L negatively affected most of the growth characteristics (plant height, plant fresh weight). It also led to a decrease in the yield of tubers (the number of tubers per plant - the average weight of a tuber (g) and the total yield / fad. (tons) . The results also showed that the increase in the salinity of irrigation water led to exhibited marked reductions in the tuber concentration content of elements N, P and K% as well as carbohydrate and inulin% during the two growing seasons. The data also revealed positive effects of 100mM H2O2 – soaked tubers on vegetative growth criteria and yield performance. Similar trend was achieved on carbohydrate, inulin tuber content and N% of tuber only in the first season of this study. The interaction study revealed that there are no marked significant variation appeared for the vegetative growth criteria during the respective seasons. The results detected on plant height and yield components indicated that growth performance was clearly manifested for the combined treatment of 100 mM H2O2-treated tubers and salinity exposure, defined from 500 up to 2000 mg/L. Similar trend was also registered on carbohydrate, inulin and only N% contents of tubers. In conclusion, it seems possibly, in particular under saline conditions, soaking the tuber in 100 mM H2O2 before planting for 2h would be essential to avoid the harmful effect of salt exposure and to achieve better records on yield component and quality and elemental composition content in tubers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity reduced plant height and fresh weight.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
salinity levels of irrigation water up to 5000 mg/Le0
Outcome
plant height, plant fresh weighte0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the salinity levels of irrigation water up to 5000 mg/L negatively affected most of the growth characteristics (plant height, plant fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity decreased tuber number, tuber weight and total yield.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
salinity of irrigation watert1
Outcome
yield of tubers (the number of tubers per plant - the average weight of a tuber (g) and the total yield / fad. (tons)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also led to a decrease in the yield of tubers (the number of tubers per plant - the average weight of a tuber (g) and the total yield / fad. (tons)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
t1

“salinity of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced tuber N, P and K concentration.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
increase in the salinity of irrigation watere0
Outcome
tuber concentration content of elements N, P and K%e0
Direction
marked reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in the salinity of irrigation water led to exhibited marked reductions in the tuber concentration content of elements N, P and K%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced tuber carbohydrate and inulin content.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
increase in the salinity of irrigation watert1
Outcome
carbohydrate and inulin%e0
Direction
marked reductionse0
Qualifier
two growing seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marked reductions in the tuber concentration content of elements N, P and K% as well as carbohydrate and inulin% during the two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
t1

“increase in the salinity of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking tubers in 100mM H2O2 improved vegetative growth and yield.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
100mM H2O2 – soaked tuberse0
Outcome
vegetative growth criteria and yield performancee0
Direction
positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive effects of 100mM H2O2 – soaked tubers on vegetative growth criteria and yield performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking tubers in 100mM H2O2 improved tuber carbohydrate, inulin and N content in the first season.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
100mM H2O2 – soaked tuberst1
Outcome
carbohydrate, inulin tuber content and N% of tubere0
Direction
Similar trende0
Qualifier
only in the first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend was achieved on carbohydrate, inulin tuber content and N% of tuber only in the first season of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
t1

“100mM H2O2 – soaked tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction treatments produced no marked significant variation in vegetative growth criteria.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
interaction studyt1
Outcome
vegetative growth criteriae0
Direction
no marked significant variatione0
Qualifier
respective seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are no marked significant variation appeared for the vegetative growth criteria during the respective seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2102–2217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
t1

“interaction study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2070–2087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 100 mM H2O2 and 500 to 2000 mg/L salinity improved plant height and yield components.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
combined treatment of 100 mM H2O2-treated tubers and salinity exposure, defined from 500 up to 2000 mg/Le0
Outcome
plant height and yield componentst1
Direction
clearly manifestede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth performance was clearly manifested for the combined treatment of 100 mM H2O2-treated tubers and salinity exposure, defined from 500 up to 2000 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2292–2446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant height and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment similarly improved tuber carbohydrate, inulin and N content.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
combined treatment of 100 mM H2O2-treated tubers and salinity exposure, defined from 500 up to 2000 mg/Lt1
Outcome
carbohydrate, inulin and only N% contents of tuberse0
Direction
Similar trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend was also registered on carbohydrate, inulin and only N% contents of tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2448–2536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑
t1

“combined treatment of 100 mM H2O2-treated tubers and salinity exposure, defined from 500 up to 2000 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2342–2446 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend soaking tubers in 100 mM H2O2 for 2h before planting under saline conditions.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichoke cv. FuseauHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
soaking the tuber in 100 mM H2O2 before planting for 2he0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under saline conditions, soaking the tuber in 100 mM H2O2 before planting for 2h would be essential to avoid the harmful effect of salt exposure and to achieve better records on yield component and quality and elemental composition content in tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2586–2835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–112 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · growth · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salinity · growth · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.