Paper · 2014 · Journal of Biological Chemistry and Environmental Sciences

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND CUTTING TIMES OF PLANT TOP ON WATER USE EFFICIENCY, PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out during the two successive summer growing seasons of 2009 and 2010 at Kaha Research farm, Kaluobia Governorate Egypt. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberoses L) 'Fuseau' cultivar was used for studying the effect of irrigation intervals (every10, 15 and 20 day) and different cutting times (at 60 and 90 days and control, i.e., without cutting) on Jerusalem artichoke tuber yield and water productivity. A split plot design was used. The results indicated that yield and its component of Jerusalem artichoke, i.e., the total and marketable yield of tuber /fed, average of tuber yield /plant and average fresh weight of tuber were increased with applied irrigation every 10 day (3661 m3) and plants without top cutting. On the other hand, dry matter content in leaves and tuber, total carbohydrates in leaves and crude fibers, inulin content in tuber were not affected by applied irrigation intervals. Total protein content in leaves was increased with applied irrigation up to 3450 m3/fed., while the same applied quantity of water reduced total crude fiber content in leaves. Dry matter, crude fibers and total carbohydrates contents of leaves were significantly increased in plants cut their top at 90 days after planting, while total protein content in leaves and total sugar in tuber significantly increased in plants without cutting (control). The results also indicated that inulin ,dry matter and crude fibers content in tuber were not significantly affected by cutting age treatments.The interaction between irrigation intervals and cutting times showed that the maximum values of the total, marketable tuber yield/fed. And average tuber weight were obtained due to irrigation interval every 15 day for the control plants (without cutting). The interaction between irrigation interval every 15 day and cutting plant at 90 day after planting gave the highest values of inulin and total sugar content in tuber, and dry matter content in leaves. Meanwhile plants subjected to cutting at 90 day after planting and supplied water irrigation intervals every 20 day increased significantly in crude fibers and total carbohydrates in leaves.The number of applied irrigations and water consumptive use (CU) were increased as the shortage of irrigation times and Cu differed significantly due to cutting ages, where cutting2 consumed more water than the other cutting times. The highest Water Use Efficiency (WUE) was recorded under 10 days intervals comparable to the other tested irrigation frequency and values of WUE differed due to cutting times; where the cutting2 gave the lowest WUE, while both of cutting1 and control gave the highest value for the first and second growing season. On other hand, results showed that the most efficient and relevant mathematic method in calculating ET crop for Jerusalem artichoke in south Delta of Egypt (El- Kanater) region was Modified Penman formula.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 10 days and no top cutting increased total and marketable tuber yield, tuber yield per plant and fresh tuber weight of Jerusalem artichoke.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
applied irrigation every 10 day (3661 m3) and plants without top cuttinge1
Outcome
the total and marketable yield of tuber /fed, average of tuber yield /plant and average fresh weight of tubere1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total and marketable yield of tuber /fed, average of tuber yield /plant and average fresh weight of tuber were increased with applied irrigation every 10 day (3661 m3) and plants without top cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter content in leaves and tuber of Jerusalem artichoke was not affected by irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
applied irrigation intervalse2
Outcome
dry matter content in leaves and tubere2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“dry matter content in leaves and tuber, total carbohydrates in leaves and crude fibers, inulin content in tuber were not affected by applied irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total carbohydrates in leaves, crude fibers and inulin content in tuber of Jerusalem artichoke were not affected by irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
applied irrigation intervalse2
Outcome
total carbohydrates in leaves and crude fibers, inulin content in tubere2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“dry matter content in leaves and tuber, total carbohydrates in leaves and crude fibers, inulin content in tuber were not affected by applied irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation up to 3450 m3/fed. increased total protein content in leaves of Jerusalem artichoke.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
applied irrigation up to 3450 m3/fed.e3
Outcome
Total protein content in leavese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e3

“Total protein content in leaves was increased with applied irrigation up to 3450 m3/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same irrigation quantity of 3450 m3/fed. reduced total crude fiber content in leaves of Jerusalem artichoke.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
the same applied quantity of watere4
Outcome
total crude fiber content in leavese4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e4

“the same applied quantity of water reduced total crude fiber content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting the top at 90 days after planting significantly increased dry matter, crude fiber and total carbohydrate content of leaves.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
cut their top at 90 days after plantinge5
Outcome
Dry matter, crude fibers and total carbohydrates contents of leavese5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e5

“Dry matter, crude fibers and total carbohydrates contents of leaves were significantly increased in plants cut their top at 90 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants without top cutting had significantly higher total protein content in leaves and total sugar in tuber than cut plants.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
without cutting (control)e6
Outcome
total protein content in leaves and total sugar in tubere6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
cuttinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e6

“total protein content in leaves and total sugar in tuber significantly increased in plants without cutting (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting age did not significantly affect inulin, dry matter or crude fiber content in tuber.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
cutting age treatmentse7
Outcome
inulin ,dry matter and crude fibers content in tubere7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e7

“inulin ,dry matter and crude fibers content in tuber were not significantly affected by cutting age treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 15 days gave the maximum total and marketable tuber yield and average tuber weight in the interaction analysis.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
irrigation interval every 15 daye1
Outcome
total, marketable tuber yield/fed. And average tuber weighte1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum values of the total, marketable tuber yield/fed. And average tuber weight were obtained due to irrigation interval every 15 day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 15 days with cutting at 90 days gave the highest inulin and total sugar in tuber and the highest dry matter in leaves.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
irrigation interval every 15 day and cutting plant at 90 day after plantinge2
Outcome
inulin and total sugar content in tuber, and dry matter content in leavese2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“The interaction between irrigation interval every 15 day and cutting plant at 90 day after planting gave the highest values of inulin and total sugar content in tuber, and dry matter content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 90 days with irrigation every 20 days increased crude fiber and total carbohydrates in leaves.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
cutting at 90 day after planting and supplied water irrigation intervals every 20 daye3
Outcome
crude fibers and total carbohydrates in leavese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e3

“Meanwhile plants subjected to cutting at 90 day after planting and supplied water irrigation intervals every 20 day increased significantly in crude fibers and total carbohydrates in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water consumptive use increased as the number of irrigation times was reduced.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
shortage of irrigation timese4
Outcome
number of applied irrigations and water consumptive use (CU)e4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e4

“The number of applied irrigations and water consumptive use (CU) were increased as the shortage of irrigation times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2180–2295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 60 days (cutting2) increased water consumptive use relative to the other cutting times.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
cutting2e5
Outcome
Cue5
Direction
moree5
Comparator
the other cutting timese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cu differed significantly due to cutting ages, where cutting2 consumed more water than the other cutting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2300–2410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 10 days gave the highest water use efficiency among the tested irrigation frequencies.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
10 days intervalse6
Outcome
Water Use Efficiency (WUE)e6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
the other tested irrigation frequencye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest Water Use Efficiency (WUE) was recorded under 10 days intervals comparable to the other tested irrigation frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2412–2539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 60 days (cutting2) gave the lowest water use efficiency.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
cutting2e7
Outcome
WUEe7
Direction
loweste7
Qualifier
for the first and second growing seasone7
Comparator
cutting1 and controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e7

“where the cutting2 gave the lowest WUE, while both of cutting1 and control gave the highest value for the first and second growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2589–2726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 60 days and the uncut control gave the highest water use efficiency in the first and second growing seasons.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
cutting1 and controle7
Outcome
WUEe7
Direction
higheste7
Qualifier
for the first and second growing seasone7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e7

“where the cutting2 gave the lowest WUE, while both of cutting1 and control gave the highest value for the first and second growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2589–2726 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Modified Penman formula was the most efficient and relevant method for calculating crop ET of Jerusalem artichoke in the south Delta of Egypt.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
most efficient and relevant mathematic method in calculating ET crope1
Setting
south Delta of Egypt (El- Kanater) regione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most efficient and relevant mathematic method in calculating ET crop for Jerusalem artichoke in south Delta of Egypt (El- Kanater) region was Modified Penman formula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2763–2932 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.