Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Organo-Chemical Fertilizers Mixtures under the Condition of Irrigation Intervals with Magnetized Water on Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke

sayed tartoura; E. El-Gamily; Z. El-Shall; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during the two growing seasons of 2017 and 2018 at the Experimental Farm, Sakha Horticulture Research Station, Horticulture Research Institute, Egypt, to study the effect of irrigation intervals, magnetized water, organic and inorganic fertilizers and their combined interactions on yield and its components of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants. The results can be summarized as follows: As for irrigation intervals treatments, the treatment were obtained from Jerusalem artichoke plants irrigated every 20 days treatment gave the highest tuber yield (tubers weight /plant and ton/fed), water use efficiency, total carbohydrates. On the other hand, plants irrigated every 25 days recorded the highest values of TSS and tuber inulin in both seasons. Jerusalem artichoke plants irrigated with magnetized water gave the highest yield and its components (number of tubers/plant, tubers weight as ton/fed), water use efficiency as well as the highest values of total carbohydrates, TSS, inulin and tuber vitamin C content compared to the lowest ones resulted in control non-magnetized water treatment in both seasons. Also, the highest yield and its components were recorded when the plants were fertilized by 50% organic + 50% mineral in both seasons. Generally, it could be recommended that the Jerusalem artichoke plants were irrigated with magnetized water every 15 or 20 days and fertilized by 50% organic (FYM compost)+ 50% mineral (NK) produced high tubers yield, improved tuber quality (carbohydrates %, inulin, vitamin C and TSS) and water use efficiency under the conditions of this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 20 days gave the highest tuber yield, water use efficiency and total carbohydrates.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse1
Treatment
irrigated every 20 dayse1
Outcome
tuber yield (tubers weight /plant and ton/fed), water use efficiency, total carbohydratese1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Jerusalem artichoke plants irrigated every 20 days treatment gave the highest tuber yield (tubers weight /plant and ton/fed), water use efficiency, total carbohydrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 25 days gave the highest TSS and tuber inulin in both seasons.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
irrigated every 25 dayse2
Outcome
TSS and tuber inuline2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“plants irrigated every 25 days recorded the highest values of TSS and tuber inulin in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized water gave the highest yield and its components and water use efficiency, compared with control non-magnetized water.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
magnetized watere3
Outcome
yield and its components (number of tubers/plant, tubers weight as ton/fed), water use efficiencye3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
control non-magnetized water treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Jerusalem artichoke plants irrigated with magnetized water gave the highest yield and its components (number of tubers/plant, tubers weight as ton/fed), water use efficiency as well as the highest values of total carbohydrates, TSS, inulin and tuber vitamin C content compared to the lowest ones resulted in control non-magnetized water treatment in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized water gave the highest total carbohydrates, TSS and inulin.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
magnetized watere3
Outcome
total carbohydrates, TSS, inuline3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
control non-magnetized water treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Jerusalem artichoke plants irrigated with magnetized water gave the highest yield and its components (number of tubers/plant, tubers weight as ton/fed), water use efficiency as well as the highest values of total carbohydrates, TSS, inulin and tuber vitamin C content compared to the lowest ones resulted in control non-magnetized water treatment in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized water gave the highest tuber vitamin C content.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
magnetized watere3
Outcome
tuber vitamin C contente3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
control non-magnetized water treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Jerusalem artichoke plants irrigated with magnetized water gave the highest yield and its components (number of tubers/plant, tubers weight as ton/fed), water use efficiency as well as the highest values of total carbohydrates, TSS, inulin and tuber vitamin C content compared to the lowest ones resulted in control non-magnetized water treatment in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization with 50% organic plus 50% mineral fertilizer gave the highest yield and its components.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
50% organic + 50% minerale4
Outcome
yield and its componentse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Also, the highest yield and its components were recorded when the plants were fertilized by 50% organic + 50% mineral in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with magnetized water every 15 or 20 days and fertilization with 50% organic plus 50% mineral is recommended for high tuber yield.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse5
Treatment
irrigated with magnetized water every 15 or 20 dayse5
Outcome
high tubers yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Generally, it could be recommended that the Jerusalem artichoke plants were irrigated with magnetized water every 15 or 20 days and fertilized by 50% organic (FYM compost)+ 50% mineral (NK) produced high tubers yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and its Components of Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.