Paper · 1995 · Journal of Vegetable Crop Production

Sidedress N Application Methods for Broccoli Production

Regina P. Bracy; Richard L. Parish; Paul E. Bergeron

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during the fall of 1991 and 1992 to determine effects of sidedress fertilizer placement at various N and preplant fertilizer rates on yield and head weight of direct-seeded broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. (Italica Group). Marketable yield, early yield, head weight, and rate of crop maturity were not affected by rate of preplant fertilizer or N sidedress. Broccoli responded similarly at sidedressed N rates from 134 lo 258 kg.ha-I and total N rates from 179 to 348 kg-ha-'. Method of applying sidedress fertilizer (Wing into or dropping onto the bed) did not affect marketable yield or head size

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rate of preplant fertilizer did not significantly alter yield, head weight or maturity.

Treatment
rate of preplant fertilizere0
Outcome
Marketable yield, early yield, head weight, and rate of crop maturitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yield, early yield, head weight, and rate of crop maturity were not affected by rate of preplant fertilizer or N sidedress. Broccoli responded similarly at sidedressed N rates from 134 lo 258 kg.ha-I and total N rates from 179 to 348 kg-ha-'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N sidedress did not significantly alter yield, head weight or maturity.

Treatment
N sidedresse0
Outcome
Marketable yield, early yield, head weight, and rate of crop maturitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yield, early yield, head weight, and rate of crop maturity were not affected by rate of preplant fertilizer or N sidedress. Broccoli responded similarly at sidedressed N rates from 134 lo 258 kg.ha-I and total N rates from 179 to 348 kg-ha-'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sidedress placement methods did not change marketable yield or head size.

Treatment
Wing into or dropping onto the bede0
Outcome
marketable yield or head sizee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Method of applying sidedress fertilizer (Wing into or dropping onto the bed) did not affect marketable yield or head size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–625 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 50 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.