Abstract
A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018 to find out the effect of irrigation and fertigation scheduling on the growth, yield and quality of mango (cv.Amrapali). The results revealed that the maximum plant height (1.94 m), circumference of rootstock (63.7cm) and scion were higher under 100% irrigation level whereas maximum yield (35.82 kgplant-1 and 12.22t ha-1) was obtained under 100% irrigation with 100% fertigation. Fruit weight, gross returns and benefit costratio were found higher (Rs. 231 g, 71,640 ha-1 and 1.49 respectively) under hundred per cent irrigation andhundred per cent fertigation treatment. However, the TSS of the fruit was not affected significantly due toirrigation and fertigation as well as their interaction effect. The studyrecommends for the adoption of drip treatmentof 100 % irrigation and 100% fertigation for techno-economic advantage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height was higher under 100% irrigation in mango.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae2 - Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Treatment
- 100% irrigation levele1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1.94 me1
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e1“maximum plant height (1.94 m), circumference of rootstock (63.7cm) and scion were higher under 100% irrigation level”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock circumference was higher under 100% irrigation in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Organ / stage
- rootstocke1
- Treatment
- 100% irrigation levele1
- Outcome
- circumference of rootstocke1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 63.7cme1
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e1“maximum plant height (1.94 m), circumference of rootstock (63.7cm) and scion were higher under 100% irrigation level”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
Claim · model-written summary
Scion circumference was higher under 100% irrigation in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Organ / stage
- scione1
- Treatment
- 100% irrigation levele1
- Outcome
- scione1
- Direction
- highere1
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e1“maximum plant height (1.94 m), circumference of rootstock (63.7cm) and scion were higher under 100% irrigation level”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum mango yield was obtained under 100% irrigation with 100% fertigation.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Treatment
- 100% irrigation with 100% fertigatione3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- 35.82 kgplant-1 and 12.22t ha-1e3
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
e3“maximum yield (35.82 kgplant-1 and 12.22t ha-1) was obtained under 100% irrigation with 100% fertigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight was higher under 100% irrigation and 100% fertigation in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Treatment
- hundred per cent irrigation andhundred per cent fertigation treatmente4
- Outcome
- Fruit weighte4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 231 ge4
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
e4“Fruit weight, gross returns and benefit costratio were found higher (Rs. 231 g, 71,640 ha-1 and 1.49 respectively) under hundred per cent irrigation andhundred per cent fertigation treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross returns were higher under 100% irrigation and 100% fertigation in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Treatment
- hundred per cent irrigation andhundred per cent fertigation treatmente4
- Outcome
- gross returnse4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 71,640 ha-1e4
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
e4“Fruit weight, gross returns and benefit costratio were found higher (Rs. 231 g, 71,640 ha-1 and 1.49 respectively) under hundred per cent irrigation andhundred per cent fertigation treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio was higher under 100% irrigation and 100% fertigation in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Treatment
- hundred per cent irrigation andhundred per cent fertigation treatmente4
- Outcome
- benefit costratioe4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 1.49e4
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
e4“Fruit weight, gross returns and benefit costratio were found higher (Rs. 231 g, 71,640 ha-1 and 1.49 respectively) under hundred per cent irrigation andhundred per cent fertigation treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit TSS of mango was not significantly affected by irrigation and fertigation.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Material
- cv.Amrapalie2
- Treatment
- irrigation and fertigatione5
- Outcome
- TSS of the fruite5
- Direction
- not affectede5
- Setting
- ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal during 2011to 2018”
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
e5“the TSS of the fruit was not affected significantly due toirrigation and fertigation as well as their interaction effect”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend adopting drip irrigation at 100% irrigation and 100% fertigation for techno-economic advantage in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae2
- Outcome
- adoption of drip treatmente6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“quality of mango (cv.Amrapali)”
e6“The studyrecommends for the adoption of drip treatmentof 100 % irrigation and100% fertigation for techno-economic advantage”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →irrigation · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →irrigation · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →fertilization · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.