Paper · 2008 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of drip irrigation regimes on growth, yield and quality of mango hybrid Arka Anmol

Dinesh Kumar; Vikramathitya Pandey; Vishal Nath

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment for drip irrigation scheduling in mango based upon the pan evaporation replenishment rate in five to ten year old trees of Arka Anmol mango was conducted. Four levels of open pan evaporation based drip irrigation schedules (25, 50, 75 and 100% pan evaporation replenishment) and one rainfed plot to serve as control with 5 replications were maintained under randomized block design. The long term experimental results revealed that significantly maximum canopy volume, fruit number and yield were recorded due to daily drip irrigation at 75% pan evaporation replenishment. The fruit quality such as fruit dry weight, pulp weight, peel weight, stone weight and TSS were observed to be improved due to drip irrigation but remained at par with rain fed (control). Maximum fruit volume and soil moisture content was recorded due to daily drip irrigation at 100% evaporation replenishment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily drip irrigation at 75% pan evaporation replenishment gave significantly maximum canopy volume, fruit number and yield.

Treatment
daily drip irrigation at 75% pan evaporation replenishmente0
Outcome
canopy volume, fruit number and yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rainfed plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum canopy volume, fruit number and yield were recorded due to daily drip irrigation at 75% pan evaporation replenishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango hybrid Arka Anmol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“one rainfed plot to serve as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation improved mango fruit dry weight, pulp weight and peel weight, but these remained at par with rainfed control.

Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit dry weight, pulp weight, peel weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
rain fed (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit dry weight, pulp weight, peel weight, stone weight and TSS were observed to be improved due to drip irrigation but remained at par with rain fed (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango hybrid Arka Anmol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation improved mango stone weight and TSS, but these remained at par with rainfed control.

Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
stone weight and TSSe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
rain fed (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit dry weight, pulp weight, peel weight, stone weight and TSS were observed to be improved due to drip irrigation but remained at par with rain fed (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango hybrid Arka Anmol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily drip irrigation at 100% evaporation replenishment gave maximum fruit volume.

Treatment
daily drip irrigation at 100% evaporation replenishmente0
Outcome
fruit volumee0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
rainfed plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum fruit volume and soil moisture content was recorded due to daily drip irrigation at 100% evaporation replenishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango hybrid Arka Anmol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“one rainfed plot to serve as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily drip irrigation at 100% evaporation replenishment gave maximum soil moisture content.

Treatment
daily drip irrigation at 100% evaporation replenishmente0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
rainfed plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum fruit volume and soil moisture content was recorded due to daily drip irrigation at 100% evaporation replenishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango hybrid Arka Anmol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“one rainfed plot to serve as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–334 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.