Paper · 2014 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Fruit yield and root system distribution of 'Tommy Atkins' mango under different irrigation regimes

Marcelo R. dos Santos; Mauro A. Martinez; Sérgio L. R. Donato; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the fruit yield and the distribution of 'Tommy Atkins' mango root system under different irrigation regimes in the semiarid region of Bahia. The experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and three replicates: 1 - Irrigation supplying 100% of ETc in phases I, II and III; 2 - Regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) supplying 50% of ETc in phase I (beginning of flowering to early fruit growth); 3 - RDI supplying 50% ETc in phase II (start of expansion until the beginning of physiological maturity); 4 - RDI supplying 50% ETc in phase III (physiological mature fruits); 5 - No irrigation during all three phases. The regulated deficit irrigation supplying 50% of the ETc during phase I and II provided larger root length density of 'Tommy Atkins' mango. Regardless of management strategy, the roots were developed in all evaluated soil volume and the highest density is concentrated from 0.50 to 1.50 m distance from the trunk and in 0.20 to 0.90 m depth in the soil, that suggests this region to be the best place for fertilizer application as well for soil water sensor placement. The application of RDI during fruit set does not influence either root distribution or production. Root system and crop production is significantly reduced under no irrigation conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI supplying 50% ETc during phase I gave greater mango root length density.

Material
'Tommy Atkins'e0
Treatment
regulated deficit irrigation supplying 50% of the ETc during phase Ie0
Outcome
root length densitye0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regulated deficit irrigation supplying 50% of the ETc during phase I and II provided larger root length density of 'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI supplying 50% ETc during phase II gave greater mango root length density.

Material
'Tommy Atkins'e0
Treatment
regulated deficit irrigation supplying 50% of the ETc during phase I and IIe0
Outcome
root length densitye0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regulated deficit irrigation supplying 50% of the ETc during phase I and II provided larger root length density of 'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango roots developed throughout the evaluated soil volume regardless of management.

Material
'Tommy Atkins't0
Outcome
roots were developed in all evaluated soil volumee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of management strategy, the roots were developed in all evaluated soil volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest mango root density was at 0.50 to 1.50 m from trunk and 0.20 to 0.90 m deep.

Material
'Tommy Atkins't0
Outcome
highest densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.50 to 1.50 me0
Qualifier
0.20 to 0.90 m depth in the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest density is concentrated from 0.50 to 1.50 m distance from the trunk and in 0.20 to 0.90 m depth in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The high-root-density region is suggested for fertilizer application and soil water sensors.

Outcome
best place for fertilizer application as well for soil water sensor placemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that suggests this region to be the best place for fertilizer application as well for soil water sensor placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI during fruit set did not influence root distribution.

Material
'Tommy Atkins't0
Treatment
RDI during fruit sete0
Outcome
root distributione0
Direction
does not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of RDI during fruit set does not influence either root distribution or production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI during fruit set did not influence production.

Material
'Tommy Atkins't0
Treatment
RDI during fruit sete0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
does not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of RDI during fruit set does not influence either root distribution or production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation significantly reduced root system.

Treatment
no irrigation conditionse0
Outcome
Root systeme0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root system and crop production is significantly reduced under no irrigation conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation significantly reduced crop production.

Treatment
no irrigation conditionse0
Outcome
crop productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root system and crop production is significantly reduced under no irrigation conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.