Abstract
The experiment was carried out on mango cv. Dusehri to investigate the effect of N, P and K fertilizers on vegetative, reproductive growth, yield and fruit quality. Eight different fertilizer combinations such as T1 (control), T2 (N), T3 (P), T4 (K), T5 (NP), T6 (NK), T7 (PK) and T8 (NPK) were used. Individual or combine fertilizer application of N (1000 g), P (750 g) and K (750 g) were applied during growing season in February and August. All the treatments significantly influenced on vegetative growth, flowering, fruiting, yield and other physiochemical attributes of mango as compared to control. Least effect was observed with individual fertilizer application while combine fertilizer treatments enhanced most of the investigated parameters. Especially, qualitative traits showed non-significant differences between treated and untreated mango trees. However, among the different treatments T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379), yield (82 kg/tree), fruit weight (197.5 g), pulp weight (135.5 g) and physiochemical parameters namely TSS (24.53), Vit. C (57.63 mg/100 mL) and total sugar (20.84%). In general, combine application of NPK (T8) were the most effective in enhancing fruiting aspects, yield, physiochemical characteristics as well as improved fruit quality of mango trees.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments significantly influenced mango vegetative growth, flowering, fruiting, yield and physicochemical attributes.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- All the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, flowering, fruiting, yield and other physiochemical attributese0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments significantly influenced on vegetative growth, flowering, fruiting, yield and other physiochemical attributes of mango as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Individual fertilizers had the least effect on assessed mango parameters.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Least effect was observed with individual fertilizer application”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined fertilizers enhanced most assessed mango parameters.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“combine fertilizer treatments enhanced most of the investigated parameters.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mango qualitative traits did not significantly differ between treated and untreated trees.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- treatede0
- Outcome
- qualitative traitse0
- Direction
- differencese0
- Comparator
- untreated mango treese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“qualitative traits showed non-significant differences between treated and untreated mango trees.”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK produced maximum growth flush size of 177.51 mm.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK produced 845 panicles per tree.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK produced 974 flowers per panicle.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK gave mango sex ratio of 69.18%.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK gave mango fruit retention of 13.85%.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK produced 379 mango fruits per tree.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK yielded 82 kg per mango tree.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379), yield (82 kg/tree)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK gave mango fruit weight of 197.5 g.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379), yield (82 kg/tree), fruit weight (197.5 g)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK gave mango pulp weight of 135.5 g.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379), yield (82 kg/tree), fruit weight (197.5 g), pulp weight (135.5 g)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK gave mango TSS of 24.53.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379), yield (82 kg/tree), fruit weight (197.5 g), pulp weight (135.5 g) and physiochemical parameters namely TSS (24.53)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK gave mango Vit. C of 57.63 mg/100 mL.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379), yield (82 kg/tree), fruit weight (197.5 g), pulp weight (135.5 g) and physiochemical parameters namely TSS (24.53), Vit. C (57.63 mg/100 mL)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK gave mango total sugar of 20.84%.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“T8 (NPK) showed significance for fruiting aspects such as maximum size of growth flushes (177.51 mm), total number of panicles/tree (845), total number of flowers/panicle (974), sex ratio (69.18%), fruit retention (13.85%), total number of fruits/tree (379), yield (82 kg/tree), fruit weight (197.5 g), pulp weight (135.5 g) and physiochemical parameters namely TSS (24.53), Vit. C (57.63 mg/100 mL) and total sugar (20.84%)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →fertilization · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →fertilization · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
27 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.