Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the effects of edaphic fertilization with N, P, and K (150-50-80, 100-60-60, and without edaphic fertilization (SFE)) and foliar fertilization with nanoparticles (NPs) of Se and Zn (Se: 50 ppm, Zn: 250 ppm, and no nanoparticles (NP0)) on the yield and antioxidant compounds of apple fruits. We conducted this study in a 20-year-old commercial orchard. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design of nine treatments. The treatments with fertilization doses of 150-50-80 and 100-60-60, supplemented with Se and Zn NPs, generally increased the yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acid of the apple fruits. The SFE + NPZn treatment produced the highest increase (+193% compared with the control) in fruit yield. The SFE + NPSe and SFE + NPZn treatments led to higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight. These compounds presented a direct correlation with the antioxidant activity in the fruits. The foliar application of Se and Zn nanoparticles supplemented the soil fertilization with N, P, and K to improve the yield and bioactive-compound synthesis of the apple fruits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization supplemented with Se and Zn nanoparticles generally increased apple yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acid.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica L.
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- fertilization doses of 150-50-80 and 100-60-60, supplemented with Se and Zn NPse0
- Outcome
- yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acide0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The treatments with fertilization doses of 150-50-80 and 100-60-60, supplemented with Se and Zn NPs, generally increased the yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acid of the apple fruits.”
t0“Malus domestica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
SFE plus NPZn produced the highest fruit yield increase, 193% over control.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica L.
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- SFE + NPZne0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- highest increasee0
- Value
- +193%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The SFE + NPZn treatment produced the highest increase (+193% compared with the control) in fruit yield.”
t0“Malus domestica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
SFE plus NPSe increased fruit phenol and flavonoid contents.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica L.
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- SFE + NPSee0
- Outcome
- contents of phenols and flavonoidse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The SFE + NPSe and SFE + NPZn treatments led to higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight.”
t0“Malus domestica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
SFE plus NPZn increased fruit phenol and flavonoid contents.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica L.
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- SFE + NPZne0
- Outcome
- contents of phenols and flavonoidse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The SFE + NPSe and SFE + NPZn treatments led to higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight.”
t0“Malus domestica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit phenol content reached a maximum of 7.6 mg GAE per gram dry weight.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica L.
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- phenolse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 7.6 mg GAEe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight”
t0“Malus domestica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit flavonoid content reached a maximum of 15.82 mg QE per gram dry weight.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica L.
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- flavonoidse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight”
t0“Malus domestica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenols and flavonoids correlated directly with fruit antioxidant activity.
- Taxon
- Malus domestica L.
Malus domesticat0 - Organ / stage
- fruitse0
- Outcome
- antioxidant activitye0
- Qualifier
- direct correlatione0
Not reportedCompoundDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“These compounds presented a direct correlation with the antioxidant activity in the fruits.”
t0“Malus domestica L.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
selenium atom · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.