Paper · 2022 · Horticulturae

Effects of Edaphic Fertilization and Foliar Application of Se and Zn Nanoparticles on Yield and Bioactive Compounds in Malus domestica L.

Anay Montaño-Herrera; Yair Olovaldo Santiago-Saenz; César Uriel López-Palestina; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the effects of edaphic fertilization with N, P, and K (150-50-80, 100-60-60, and without edaphic fertilization (SFE)) and foliar fertilization with nanoparticles (NPs) of Se and Zn (Se: 50 ppm, Zn: 250 ppm, and no nanoparticles (NP0)) on the yield and antioxidant compounds of apple fruits. We conducted this study in a 20-year-old commercial orchard. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design of nine treatments. The treatments with fertilization doses of 150-50-80 and 100-60-60, supplemented with Se and Zn NPs, generally increased the yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acid of the apple fruits. The SFE + NPZn treatment produced the highest increase (+193% compared with the control) in fruit yield. The SFE + NPSe and SFE + NPZn treatments led to higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight. These compounds presented a direct correlation with the antioxidant activity in the fruits. The foliar application of Se and Zn nanoparticles supplemented the soil fertilization with N, P, and K to improve the yield and bioactive-compound synthesis of the apple fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization supplemented with Se and Zn nanoparticles generally increased apple yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acid.

Taxon
Malus domestica L.Malus domesticat0
Treatment
fertilization doses of 150-50-80 and 100-60-60, supplemented with Se and Zn NPse0
Outcome
yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with fertilization doses of 150-50-80 and 100-60-60, supplemented with Se and Zn NPs, generally increased the yield, sugar content, and ascorbic acid of the apple fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SFE plus NPZn produced the highest fruit yield increase, 193% over control.

Taxon
Malus domestica L.Malus domesticat0
Treatment
SFE + NPZne0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highest increasee0
Value
+193%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SFE + NPZn treatment produced the highest increase (+193% compared with the control) in fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SFE plus NPSe increased fruit phenol and flavonoid contents.

Taxon
Malus domestica L.Malus domesticat0
Treatment
SFE + NPSee0
Outcome
contents of phenols and flavonoidse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SFE + NPSe and SFE + NPZn treatments led to higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SFE plus NPZn increased fruit phenol and flavonoid contents.

Taxon
Malus domestica L.Malus domesticat0
Treatment
SFE + NPZne0
Outcome
contents of phenols and flavonoidse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SFE + NPSe and SFE + NPZn treatments led to higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit phenol content reached a maximum of 7.6 mg GAE per gram dry weight.

Taxon
Malus domestica L.Malus domesticat0
Outcome
phenolse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.6 mg GAEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit flavonoid content reached a maximum of 15.82 mg QE per gram dry weight.

Taxon
Malus domestica L.Malus domesticat0
Outcome
flavonoidse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher contents of phenols and flavonoids, with maximum values of 7.6 mg GAE and 15.82 mg QE per gram of dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenols and flavonoids correlated directly with fruit antioxidant activity.

Taxon
Malus domestica L.Malus domesticat0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Qualifier
direct correlatione0

Not reportedCompoundDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These compounds presented a direct correlation with the antioxidant activity in the fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

selenium atom · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 23 positive, 16 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.