Paper · 2020 · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research

Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation improved fertility andproductivity of drip-irrigated sandy soil: Field observations on peanut (Arachishypogaea L.)

L Abido; M Omar; M Abd-Alla; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out during 2016 and 2017 summer seasons in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with five replicates under the ecological conditions of Noubaria District, Beheira Governorate, Egypt to evaluate the applicability potential of Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation for improving soil fertility and productivity of peanut grown on a dripirrigated sandy soil compared to compost and mineral fertilizers applications. Physicochemical analysis revealed the high nutrients content of humic substances as well as their nano-sized diameter and abundance of active functional groups. Organic inputs (compost in particular) improved water retention and the lateral water movement in the rhizosphere compared to the prevalence of gravitydominated vertical movement in the mineral fertigation treatment. Compost application recorded the highest soil organic matter content, which decreased soil pH value. However, Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation exhibited the highest concentrations of available nutrients (N, P and K) and nodulation parameters (nodules number and their dry weight) compared to compost and mineral fertilizers. Although mineral fertigation induced the highest vegetative growth characters, Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation elicited the highest quantitative and qualitative yield indices. The current study, provides insights into the potential fertigation of N-fixing bacteria alongside with humic substances for maximizing water and nutrient supply potentials of drip-irrigated sandy soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic inputs, compost in particular, improved water retention and lateral water movement in the peanut rhizosphere compared with mineral fertigation.

Treatment
Organic inputs (compost in particular)e0
Outcome
water retention and the lateral water movemente0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
mineral fertigation treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic inputs (compost in particular) improved water retention and the lateral water movement in the rhizosphere compared to the prevalence of gravitydominated vertical movement in the mineral fertigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut (Arachishypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost application recorded the highest soil organic matter content in the peanut field.

Treatment
Compost applicatione0
Outcome
soil organic matter contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost application recorded the highest soil organic matter content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut (Arachishypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost application decreased soil pH value.

Treatment
Compost applicatione0
Outcome
soil pH valuee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost application recorded the highest soil organic matter content, which decreased soil pH value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut (Arachishypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation gave the highest nodulation parameters (nodule number and dry weight) compared with compost and mineral fertilizers.

Treatment
Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigatione0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation parameters (nodules number and their dry weight)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
compost and mineral fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation exhibited the highest concentrations of available nutrients (N, P and K) and nodulation parameters (nodules number and their dry weight) compared to compost and mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut (Arachishypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertigation induced the highest vegetative growth characters in peanut.

Treatment
mineral fertigatione0
Outcome
vegetative growth characterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although mineral fertigation induced the highest vegetative growth characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut (Arachishypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation elicited the highest quantitative and qualitative yield indices in peanut.

Treatment
Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigatione0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
quantitative and qualitative yield indicese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bradyrhizobium and humic substances fertigation elicited the highest quantitative and qualitative yield indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut (Arachishypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–162 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Bradyrhizobium · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

other · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

other · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 41 positive, 2 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 71 positive, 9 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

organic · physiology: water · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.