Paper · 1997 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Nitrogen management and biological nitrogen fixation in sorghum/pigeonpea intercropping on Alfisols of the semi-arid tropics

Joseph J. Adu-Gyamfi; O. Ito; T. Yoneyama; et al.

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). are grown as intercrops on soils typified by low nitrogen (N). particularly Alfisols and Vertisols of the semi-arid tropical areas of India and East Africa. Proper management of fertilizer N in sorghum/pigeonpea intercropping systems is essential to enhancing biological nitrogen fixing ability of pigeonpea, and to increasing grain yields of sorghum.In a 3-year study, we examined the effect of time and rates of fertilizer N application on biological N fixation (BNF) and fertilizer N recovery by pigeonpea and sorghum grown as a sole crop, and as an intercrop on an Alfisol in India. In 1993, N (50 kg N ha−1) was all applied at planting (basal) or at 40 days after sowing (delayed). During 1994–1995, four N rates 0, 25, 50, and 100 kg ha−1 were applied (i) 100% at planting (basal) or (ii) 67% at 40 days, and 33% at 60 days after sowing (delayed).Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS), rather than applying at sowing significantly increased (p < 0.001) total dry matter, grain yield (GY) and total N content (TNC) of the sorghum, but not of pigeonpea. Highest GY and TNC was recorded at an N rate of 50 kg ha −1 with sole crop sorghum, and at 25 kg ha−1 for intercrop sorghum. Delaying N fertilization to sorghum significantly (p < 0.001) increased 15N recovery in the shoot from 15 to 32% in sole crop, and 10 to 32% in intercrop. Similarly, there was a significant (p < 0.001) increase in N recovery (calculated without 15N, but by the difference between the nonfertilized N and fertilized plots) from 43–59% in sole crop and from 28–71% in intercrop sorghum. Pigeonpea fixed between 120–170 kg ha−1 of atmospheric N throughout the cropping season. Nitrogen application to the sorghum row, but not to the pigeonpea, enhanced BNF by pigeonpea and maximized fertilizer recovery by sorghum in a sorghum/pigeonpea intercropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed N application increased sorghum total dry matter.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
applying at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS), rather than applying at sowing significantly increased (p < 0.001) total dry matter, grain yield (GY) and total N content (TNC) of the sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed N application increased sorghum grain yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
grain yield (GY)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
applying at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS), rather than applying at sowing significantly increased (p < 0.001) total dry matter, grain yield (GY) and total N content (TNC) of the sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed N application increased sorghum total N content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
total N content (TNC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
applying at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS), rather than applying at sowing significantly increased (p < 0.001) total dry matter, grain yield (GY) and total N content (TNC) of the sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same delayed application did not significantly increase pigeonpea traits.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Outcome
total dry matter, grain yield (GY) and total N content (TNC)e1
Comparator
applying at sowinge1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not of pigeonpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delaying N fertilization until 40 days after sowing (DAS), rather than applying at sowing significantly increased (p < 0.001) total dry matter, grain yield (GY) and total N content (TNC) of the sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sorghum had its highest grain yield and N content at 50 kg ha −1.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
50 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
GY and TNCe0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest GY and TNC was recorded at an N rate of 50 kg ha −1 with sole crop sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1237 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop sorghum had its highest grain yield and N content at 25 kg ha−1.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
GY and TNCe1
Direction
Higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 25 kg ha−1 for intercrop sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest GY and TNC was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed N increased sole sorghum shoot 15N recovery from 15 to 32%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Delaying N fertilizatione0
Outcome
15N recovery in the shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15 to 32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N fertilization to sorghum significantly (p < 0.001) increased 15N recovery in the shoot from 15 to 32% in sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed N increased intercrop sorghum shoot 15N recovery from 10 to 32%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Delaying N fertilizatione1
Outcome
15N recovery in the shoote1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10 to 32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 to 32% in intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1433 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delaying N fertilization to sorghum significantly (p < 0.001) increased 15N recovery in the shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed N increased sole sorghum difference based N recovery from 43–59%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Delaying N fertilizatione1
Outcome
N recoverye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43–59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (p < 0.001) increase in N recovery (calculated without 15N, but by the difference between the nonfertilized N and fertilized plots) from 43–59% in sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1626 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delaying N fertilization to sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed N increased intercrop sorghum difference based N recovery from 28–71%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Delaying N fertilizatione2
Outcome
N recoverye1
Direction
increasee1
Value
28–71%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 28–71% in intercrop sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1663 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant (p < 0.001) increase in N recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1504 · show in text ↑
e2

“Delaying N fertilization to sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1315 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea fixed 120–170 kg ha−1 atmospheric N across the season.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
atmospheric Ne0
Value
120–170 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeonpea fixed between 120–170 kg ha−1 of atmospheric N throughout the cropping season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying N to sorghum rows but not pigeonpea enhanced pigeonpea BNF.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Nitrogen application to the sorghum rowe0
Outcome
BNF by pigeonpeae0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
not to the pigeonpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application to the sorghum row, but not to the pigeonpea, enhanced BNF by pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying N to sorghum rows but not pigeonpea maximized sorghum fertilizer recovery.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Nitrogen application to the sorghum rowe0
Outcome
fertilizer recovery by sorghume0
Direction
maximizede0
Comparator
not to the pigeonpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application to the sorghum row, but not to the pigeonpea, enhanced BNF by pigeonpea and maximized fertilizer recovery by sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1891 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ

120 papers: 104 positive, 16 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

nitrogen · organism · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

118 papers: 111 positive, 7 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.