Abstract
Because of the growing need of finding alternative fuel, interest is increasing in biofuel crops such as sweet sorghum. Unfortunately, many challenges such as the input cost must be overcome before this plant can be sustainably and profitably used for biofuel production. One way to lower the input cost is through nitrogen fertilization management. To test how sorghum respond to N fertilization, M81E variety used was. The experiment was carried out in three types of soil (clay, sand, and Tipton loam) in Portageville (South Missouri). Seven N rate were applied i.e. (0, 22, 45, 67, 90, 112, and 135 kg/ha) with four repeats. Sorghum was harvested 5 months after planting. Data was collected on biomass production, juice yield, water content, pH, density, sugar yield. SAS was used to determine the differences between treatments. The biomass is highly affected by the soil type (P<.0001), and not by N rate. The amount of water accumulated in sorghum stalk in related to the soil type (P<.0001) and unlike the water content, to the N rate applied (P=0.01). The density of sorghum juice does not depend on the N rate (P=0.34) but instead on the soil type (P=0.02). The pH of sorghum juice does not depend either on the soil type (P=0.13) or on the N rate (P= 0.19). The volume and weight of juice obtained depends on both the soil type (P<.0001) and the N rate (P<0.03). The sugar yield depends on both the soil type (P<.0001) and the N rate (P= 0.02).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Soil type significantly affected sorghum biomass.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“The biomass is highly affected by the soil type (P<.0001)”
t0“sweet sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate did not affect sorghum biomass.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The biomass is highly affected by the soil type (P<.0001), and not by N rate.”
t0“sweet sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil type was related to water accumulated in sorghum stalk.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The amount of water accumulated in sorghum stalk in related to the soil type (P<.0001)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate was related to water accumulated in sorghum stalk.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The amount of water accumulated in sorghum stalk in related to the soil type (P<.0001) and unlike the water content, to the N rate applied (P=0.01)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate did not affect sorghum juice density.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The density of sorghum juice does not depend on the N rate (P=0.34)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil type was related to sorghum juice density.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The density of sorghum juice does not depend on the N rate (P=0.34) but instead on the soil type (P=0.02)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum juice pH did not depend on soil type.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pH of sorghum juice does not depend either on the soil type (P=0.13)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum juice pH did not depend on nitrogen rate.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pH of sorghum juice does not depend either on the soil type (P=0.13) or on the N rate (P= 0.19)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil type affected the volume and weight of sorghum juice.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“The volume and weight of juice obtained depends on both the soil type (P<.0001)”
t0“sweet sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate affected the volume and weight of sorghum juice.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The volume and weight of juice obtained depends on both the soil type (P<.0001) and the N rate (P<0.03)”
t0“sweet sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil type affected sorghum sugar yield.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“The sugar yield depends on both the soil type (P<.0001)”
t0“sweet sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate affected sorghum sugar yield.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The sugar yield depends on both the soil type (P<.0001) and the N rate (P= 0.02)”
t0“sweet sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · SorghumResults differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →nitrogen · organism · SorghumPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
nitrogen · soil: chemistry · SorghumPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.