Paper · 2022 · Plants

Jasmonic Acid Activates the Fruit-Pedicel Abscission Zone of ‘Thompson Seedless’ Grapes, Especially with Co-Application of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic Acid

Matthew W. Fidelibus; Peter Petracek; Steven McArtney

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to determine how methyl jasmonate (MeJA), jasmonic acid (JA), and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) affect grape berry abscission in the initial days after treatment. The overarching goal was to determine whether JA, with or without ACC, may hold the potential to sufficiently reduce fruit detachment force (FDF) and increase the proportion of berries with dry stem scars while minimizing preharvest abscission, effects that could be useful in the production of stemless table grapes. On Thompson Seedless grapes, JA was at least as effective as MeJA for stimulating berry abscission based on reduced fruit detachment force (FDF) and yielding detached berries with dry stem scars. Further, since previous studies showed that ACC improved MeJA-induced grape abscission, we tested ACC effects on JA activity. We found that JA rapidly induced preharvest berry abscission, confirming previous results. ACC alone did not induce preharvest berry abscission, but ACC improved the effectiveness of JA on reducing FDF and increasing dry stem scar development. These studies also demonstrated that JA-induced abscission occurs within the first day after treatment. Commercial use of JA plus ACC as an abscission agent requires that FDF sufficiently declines, and the incidence of dry stem scars increases, prior to a significant increase in fruit abscission. However, the rapid progression of fruit abscission may require harvest either within 24 and 48 h after treatment or the use of a passive catch system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA reduced fruit detachment force at least as effectively as MeJA.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Thompson Seedlesse0
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
fruit detachment force (FDF)e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
MeJAe0

Verbatim

e0

“On Thompson Seedless grapes, JA was at least as effective as MeJA for stimulating berry abscission based on reduced fruit detachment force (FDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA yielded detached berries with dry stem scars at least as effectively as MeJA.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Thompson Seedlesse0
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
detached berries with dry stem scarse0
Comparator
MeJAe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“On Thompson Seedless grapes, JA was at least as effective as MeJA for stimulating berry abscission based on reduced fruit detachment force (FDF) and yielding detached berries with dry stem scars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA rapidly induced preharvest berry abscission.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
preharvest berry abscissione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“JA rapidly induced preharvest berry abscission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC alone did not induce preharvest berry abscission.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
ACCe0
Outcome
preharvest berry abscissione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“ACC alone did not induce preharvest berry abscission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC improved the JA effect on reducing fruit detachment force.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
ACCe0
Outcome
FDFe0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
JAe0

Verbatim

e0

“ACC improved the effectiveness of JA on reducing FDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC improved the JA effect on increasing dry stem scar development.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
ACCe0
Outcome
dry stem scar developmente0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
JAe0

Verbatim

e0

“ACC improved the effectiveness of JA on reducing FDF and increasing dry stem scar development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA-induced abscission occurred within the first day after treatment.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
JA-induced abscissione0
Qualifier
within the first day after treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“JA-induced abscission occurs within the first day after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest harvesting within 24 and 48 h or using a passive catch system because of rapid abscission.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
harvest either within 24 and 48 h after treatment or the use of a passive catch systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“the rapid progression of fruit abscission may require harvest either within 24 and 48 h after treatment or the use of a passive catch system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑

1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

jasmonic acid · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.