Paper · 2014 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Methyl Jasmonate and 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid Interact to Promote Grape Berry Abscission

Lorena Uzquiza; Pedro Martin; James R. Sievert; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
24
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The application of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) or ethephon, an ethylene-releasing agent, to Thompson Seedless grapes can reduce fruit detachment force (FDF) and promote the development of dry stem scars on berries, possibly improving the quality of machine-harvested grapes. However, the amount of MeJA or ethephon needed to stimulate abscission may be prohibitively expensive and result in excessive residues. Thus, experiments were conducted to determine whether MeJA might interact with 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), a natural biochemical precursor of ethylene, to promote abscission-related processes and possibly reduce the amount of MeJA needed. In a preliminary trial, MeJA (672 and 1,344 mg/L) interacted with ACC (500 and 1,000 mg/L) to reduce FDF by 25 to 70% compared with untreated grapes. However, MeJA and ACC did not interact to affect preharvest fruit drop, although treatment with 672 or 1,344 mg/L MeJA caused 16 to 23% drop by 3 days after treatment (DAT). In a second trial, grapes treated with MeJA, singly, or with ACC, produced ethylene which peaked at 1 DAT, remained elevated at 2 DAT, and declined rapidly thereafter, whereas grapes treated only with ACC maintained moderately elevated ethylene production throughout the 10-day study. Treatment with ACC or MeJA reduced FDF within 1 or 2 DAT, respectively. By 2 DAT, berries began to abscise from MeJA-treated clusters, regardless of whether they were also treated with ACC, but on 3, 4, and 10 DAT, ACC and MeJA interacted to greatly promote preharvest fruit drop. Moreover, the combination of ACC and MeJA also promoted dry stem scar development. Thus, coapplication of MeJA and ACC is more effective at stimulating grape abscission-related processes than either compound applied singly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA and ACC together reduced fruit detachment force by 25 to 70% versus untreated grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
MeJA (672 and 1,344 mg/L) interacted with ACC (500 and 1,000 mg/L)e0
Outcome
FDFe0
Direction
reducee0
Value
25 to 70%e0
Comparator
untreated grapese0

Verbatim

e0

“MeJA (672 and 1,344 mg/L) interacted with ACC (500 and 1,000 mg/L) to reduce FDF by 25 to 70% compared with untreated grapes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–812 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA and ACC did not interact for preharvest fruit drop in the preliminary trial.

Treatment
MeJA and ACCe0
Outcome
preharvest fruit drope0
Direction
did not interacte0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“MeJA and ACC did not interact to affect preharvest fruit drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA alone caused 16 to 23% fruit drop by three days after treatment.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
672 or 1,344 mg/L MeJAe0
Outcome
drope0
Direction
causede0
Value
16 to 23%e0
Qualifier
3 days after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with 672 or 1,344 mg/L MeJA caused 16 to 23% drop by 3 days after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene production after MeJA alone or with ACC peaked at one day, stayed elevated at two days, then declined.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
MeJA, singly, or with ACCe0
Outcome
ethylenee0
Direction
peaked at 1 DAT, remained elevated at 2 DAT, and declined rapidly thereaftere0

Verbatim

e0

“grapes treated with MeJA, singly, or with ACC, produced ethylene which peaked at 1 DAT, remained elevated at 2 DAT, and declined rapidly thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC alone maintained moderately elevated ethylene production for ten days.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
ACCe0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
maintained moderately elevatede0
Qualifier
10-day studye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes treated only with ACC maintained moderately elevated ethylene production throughout the 10-day study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC reduced grape fruit detachment force within one day.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
ACCe0
Outcome
FDFe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with ACC or MeJA reduced FDF within 1 or 2 DAT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA reduced grape fruit detachment force within two days.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
MeJAe0
Outcome
FDFe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with ACC or MeJA reduced FDF within 1 or 2 DAT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA treated berries began abscising by two days regardless of ACC.

Treatment
MeJA-treatede0
Outcome
berries began to abscisee0
Qualifier
regardless of whether they were also treated with ACCe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“By 2 DAT, berries began to abscise from MeJA-treated clusters, regardless of whether they were also treated with ACC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1460 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC and MeJA interacted to promote preharvest fruit drop at three, four and ten days.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
ACC and MeJAe0
Outcome
preharvest fruit drope0
Direction
greatly promotee0
Qualifier
3, 4, and 10 DATe0

Verbatim

e0

“on 3, 4, and 10 DAT, ACC and MeJA interacted to greatly promote preharvest fruit drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC and MeJA together promoted dry stem scar development.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
combination of ACC and MeJAe0
Outcome
dry stem scar developmente0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of ACC and MeJA also promoted dry stem scar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑

1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.