Paper · 2022 · Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

Effect of the Application of Foliar Jasmonic Acid and Drought Stress on Grain Yield and Some Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Chenopodium quinoa Cultivars

Azadeh KESHTKAR; Ahmad AIEN; Hormozd NAGHAVİ; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water shortage is a critical problem touching plant growth and yield in arid and semi-arid areas such as Iran. Plant hormones such as jasmonic acid (JA) play a crucial role in altering plant morphology in response to stress. To investigate the effect of JA and drought stress on grain yield and some physiological and biochemical characteristics of quinoa cultivars, a split-plot factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted at Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center over two crop years (2018-2019). In this experiment, drought stress as the main factor in two levels including non-stress and stress based on 60% and 90% soil available moisture depletion and JA foliar application (0, 1 and 2 mg L-1) and cultivars (Giza1, Titicaca, Q29) respectively, as factorial were sub factor. The maximum grain yield (3775 kg ha-1) was obtained in Giza1 cultivar under non-stress condition and 1 mg L-1 JA foliar application. The greatest grain protein and total chlorophyll content were obtained in Titicaca cultivar under non-stress and 1 mg L-1 JA foliar application by 18.17% and 1.83 mg g-1 fresh leaf weight, respectively. In the opposite trend, the maximum amount of malondialdehyde was observed under drought stress and non-use of JA. In general, given the results of this study, it can be stated that JA caused an increase in grain yield in quinoa cultivars by reducing the harmful effects of drought stress and improving plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza1 had maximum grain yield of 3775 kg ha-1 without drought at 1 mg L-1 foliar JA.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Material
Giza1e0
Treatment
1 mg L-1 JA foliar applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3775 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
non-stress conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield (3775 kg ha-1) was obtained in Giza1 cultivar under non-stress condition and 1 mg L-1 JA foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titicaca had greatest grain protein of 18.17% without drought at 1 mg L-1 JA.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Material
Titicacae0
Treatment
1 mg L-1 JA foliar applicatione0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
greateste0
Value
18.17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest grain protein and total chlorophyll content were obtained in Titicaca cultivar under non-stress and 1 mg L-1 JA foliar application by 18.17% and 1.83 mg g-1 fresh leaf weight, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titicaca had greatest chlorophyll content of 1.83 mg g-1 fresh leaf weight under the same conditions.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Material
Titicacae0
Treatment
1 mg L-1 JA foliar applicatione0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
greateste0
Value
1.83 mg g-1 fresh leaf weighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest grain protein and total chlorophyll content were obtained in Titicaca cultivar under non-stress and 1 mg L-1 JA foliar application by 18.17% and 1.83 mg g-1 fresh leaf weight, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malondialdehyde was highest under drought without JA.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
drought stress and non-use of JAe0
Outcome
amount of malondialdehydee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum amount of malondialdehyde was observed under drought stress and non-use of JA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–170 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded JA increased quinoa grain yield by reducing drought damage and improving growth.

Taxon
quinoa cultivarsChenopodium quinoae0
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
reducing the harmful effects of drought stress and improving plant growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JA caused an increase in grain yield in quinoa cultivars by reducing the harmful effects of drought stress and improving plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1522 · show in text ↑

jasmonic acid · yield · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · quality: protein · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.