Paper · 2021 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Effect of Calcium, Boron and Micronutrient Formulations on Berry Cracking in Grapes var. Muscat Hamburg

Parthiban S; Indirani R; Subbiah A; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Muscat Hamburg (Panneer) is the most popular cultivar in Tamil Nadu for its pleasant musk flavor. It is consumed as table variety and also used for juice and wine-making purposes. The present investigation was conducted during summer and winter pruning from April 2016 to March 2018, in the grapes vineyard located at Shanmuganathy dam road, Rayappanpatty village in Cumbum valley of Theni district, Tamil Nadu. The experiment was laid out by adopting Randomized Block Design with seven treatments and three replications. The exeprimental results revealed that the treatment with foliar application of chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1% recorded the maximum number of bunches (41.00 vine-1), fruit yield (14.87 kg vine-1), individual bunch weight (636.87g), bunch volume (498.42 mL) and TSS (19.530brix). The minimum berry cracking (3.46%), titrable acidity (0.52%) and physiological loss in weight (10.18%) were also recorded in the treatment with chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1% (T5) as compared to other treatments. Further, the same treatment combination noted the lowest berry shattering (2.42%). Whereas the highest berry diameter was recorded in the treatment with a spray of calcium chloride @ 0.3% than all other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid gave maximum bunch number of 41.00 vine-1.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
foliar application of chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1%e0
Outcome
number of bunchese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41.00 vine-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1% recorded the maximum number of bunches (41.00 vine-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid gave maximum fruit yield of 14.87 kg vine-1.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Value
14.87 kg vine-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield (14.87 kg vine-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid gave bunch weight of 636.87g.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
individual bunch weighte0
Value
636.87ge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“individual bunch weight (636.87g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid gave bunch volume of 498.42 mL.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
bunch volumee0
Value
498.42 mLe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“bunch volume (498.42 mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid gave TSS of 19.530brix.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
TSSe0
Value
19.530brixe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“TSS (19.530brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid minimized berry cracking at 3.46%.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1%e0
Outcome
berry crackinge0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.46%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“minimum berry cracking (3.46%), titrable acidity (0.52%) and physiological loss in weight (10.18%) were also recorded in the treatment with chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1% (T5) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid minimized titrable acidity at 0.52%.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1%e0
Outcome
titrable aciditye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.52%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“minimum berry cracking (3.46%), titrable acidity (0.52%) and physiological loss in weight (10.18%) were also recorded in the treatment with chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1% (T5) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated calcium plus boric acid minimized physiological loss in weight at 10.18%.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1%e0
Outcome
physiological loss in weighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
10.18%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“minimum berry cracking (3.46%), titrable acidity (0.52%) and physiological loss in weight (10.18%) were also recorded in the treatment with chelated EDTA calcium @ 0.2% + boric acid @ 0.1% (T5) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same calcium and boric acid treatment gave lowest berry shattering of 2.42%.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
berry shatteringe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.42%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the same treatment combination noted the lowest berry shattering (2.42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride spray at 0.3% gave the highest berry diameter.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
a spray of calcium chloride @ 0.3%e0
Outcome
berry diametere0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“highest berry diameter was recorded in the treatment with a spray of calcium chloride @ 0.3% than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · yield · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

calcium atom · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

calcium atom · yield · VitisResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.