Paper · 2021 · FRUIT GROWING RESEARCH

USE PF URBAN SLUDGE COMPOST AS FERTILIZANT ON APPLE ORCHARDS

Claudia Nicola; Mihaela Paraschiv

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study shows the influence of compost fertilization derived from sludge obtained from wastewater treatment on the nutrition of an eight-year-old apple orchard, ʹJonathanʹ cv. A field experiment was conducted to demonstrate the beneficial and negative aspects of (urban) sludge compost fertilization in apples and to assess the risk of soil contamination with heavy metals from municipal sewage sludge compost. The experimental factor was the compost with the following gradations: V1 = 0 t/ha, V2 = 20 t/ha, V3 = 40 t/ha, V4 = 60 t/ha, V5 = 80 t/ha. After two years (2019-2021) from soil fertilization with compost, the nitrogen content of the leaves increased in the treatment with the maximum fertilization dose (80 t/ha) by 30% compared to the unfertilized control, while the phosphorus content of leaves increased by 80% compared to non-fertilization control. The potassium content of the leaves increased by 36% in the 80 t/ha treatment compared to the unfertilized control, but still remained at a deficit level. The results showed that growth and yield were improved by using sewage sludge compost. However, sewage sludge compost applications have not significantly altered the heavy metal content of plant tissues. The concentration of heavy metals in the soil did not exceed the maximum permissible thresholds according to standards established in other EU countries, where compost from sewage sludge is considered product, not waste. However, the calculation of the Igeo index (geoaccumulation index of heavy metal in soil) showed certain levels of soil pollution already installed with Cd Zn, Pb in all variants fertilized with compost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum compost dose of 80 t/ha increased apple leaf nitrogen content by 30% compared with the unfertilized control.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
maximum fertilization dose (80 t/ha)e1
Outcome
nitrogen content of the leavese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
30%e1
Comparator
unfertilized controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“the nitrogen content of the leaves increased in the treatment with the maximum fertilization dose (80 t/ha) by 30% compared to the unfertilized control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost fertilization increased apple leaf phosphorus content by 80% compared with the non-fertilization control.

Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
fertilization with composte1
Outcome
phosphorus content of leavese2
Direction
increasede2
Value
80%e2
Comparator
non-fertilization controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“while the phosphorus content of leaves increased by 80% compared to non-fertilization control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“After two years (2019-2021) from soil fertilization with compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80 t/ha compost treatment increased apple leaf potassium content by 36% compared with the unfertilized control.

Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
80 t/ha treatmente3
Outcome
potassium content of the leavese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
36%e3
Comparator
unfertilized controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e3

“The potassium content of the leaves increased by 36% in the 80 t/ha treatment compared to the unfertilized control, but still remained at a deficit level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1021 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple leaf potassium content remained at a deficit level even at 80 t/ha compost.

Outcome
potassium content of the leavese3
Qualifier
remained at a deficit levele3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e3

“The potassium content of the leaves increased by 36% in the 80 t/ha treatment compared to the unfertilized control, but still remained at a deficit level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge compost improved growth and yield of apple.

Treatment
using sewage sludge composte4
Outcome
growth and yielde4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results showed that growth and yield were improved by using sewage sludge compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge compost applications did not significantly alter heavy metal content of apple plant tissues.

Treatment
sewage sludge compost applicationse5
Outcome
heavy metal content of plant tissuese5
Direction
not significantly alterede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“sewage sludge compost applications have not significantly altered the heavy metal content of plant tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil heavy metal concentrations in the apple orchard did not exceed the maximum permissible thresholds.

Outcome
concentration of heavy metals in the soile6
Qualifier
did not exceed the maximum permissible thresholdse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e6

“The concentration of heavy metals in the soil did not exceed the maximum permissible thresholds according to standards established in other EU countries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1379 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Igeo index showed soil pollution with Cd, Zn and Pb in all compost-fertilized variants of the apple orchard.

Outcome
soil pollutione7
Qualifier
Cd Zn, Pb in all variants fertilized with composte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight-year-old apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–162 · show in text ↑
e7

“showed certain levels of soil pollution already installed with Cd Zn, Pb in all variants fertilized with compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1650 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

organic · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

organic · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.