Paper · 2011 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Grafting and cultivation experiments on tetraploid watermelon.

He Yi; Wenxin Li; Hong RiXin; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective]An grafting experiment was conducted with the tetraploid watermelon varieties,viz.,402,403 and their cross combinations in order to explore the possibilities of Fusarium wilt control in continuous cropping system of tetraploid watermelon in Guangxi.[Method]The local calabash was used as rootstock and watermelon varieties 402 and 403,and their cross combinations(403×B15,403×JL and 402×JL) were used as scion.Graft survival rates were recorded at 10th day after grafting,and the early maturity,resistance to Fusarium wilt disease,yield and fruit quality have been observed.[Result]The five grafted combinations showed good compatibilities and their graft survival rates ranged from 97.14-100.00%.The date of the second female flowers blooming in grafted watermelon plants was delayed by 2-3 days compared to original ones.However,the node of the second female flower raised by 2 nodes.All the five grafted combinations showed high-resistance to Fusarium wilt disease.Their average single fruit weight and yield were higher than those of original ones and the highest increase in yield was observed in grafted watermelon combination of 402×JL.No significant differences in soluble solid content,pulp color,fruit texture and flavor were observed between grafted watermelon plants and original ones.[Conclusion]The results revealed the resistance to Fusarium wilt disease in grafted plants using local calabash as rootstock and tetraploid watermelon(402 and 403) and their cross combinations(403×B15,403×JL and 402×JL) as scion.The grafting technology was found suitable for promotion and application in commercial production of watermelons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Graft survival rates of the five grafted tetraploid watermelon combinations ranged from 97.14-100.00%.

Taxon
tetraploid watermelont0
Outcome
graft survival ratese0
Value
97.14-100.00%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The five grafted combinations showed good compatibilities and their graft survival rates ranged from 97.14-100.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The date of second female flower blooming was delayed by 2-3 days in grafted watermelon plants compared with original ones.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
date of the second female flowers bloominge0
Direction
delayede0
Value
2-3 dayse0
Comparator
original onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The date of the second female flowers blooming in grafted watermelon plants was delayed by 2-3 days compared to original ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The node of the second female flower was raised by 2 nodes in the grafted combinations.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftede1
Outcome
node of the second female flowere0
Direction
raisede0
Value
2 nodese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the node of the second female flower raised by 2 nodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“The five grafted combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five grafted combinations showed high resistance to Fusarium wilt disease.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftede0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Fusarium wilt diseasee0
Direction
high-resistancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the five grafted combinations showed high-resistance to Fusarium wilt disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average single fruit weight and yield of grafted plants were higher than those of original ones.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftede1
Outcome
average single fruit weight and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
original onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their average single fruit weight and yield were higher than those of original ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1062 · show in text ↑
e1

“The five grafted combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield increase was observed in the grafted combination 402×JL.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
402×JLe0
Outcome
increase in yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest increase in yield was observed in grafted watermelon combination of 402×JL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences in soluble solid content and pulp color were observed between grafted and original watermelon plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted watermelon plantse0
Outcome
soluble solid content,pulp colore0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
original onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences in soluble solid content,pulp color,fruit texture and flavor were observed between grafted watermelon plants and original ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences in fruit texture and flavor were observed between grafted and original watermelon plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted watermelon plantse0
Outcome
fruit texture and flavore0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
original onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences in soluble solid content,pulp color,fruit texture and flavor were observed between grafted watermelon plants and original ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“tetraploid watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found grafting technology suitable for promotion and application in commercial watermelon production.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
suitable for promotion and applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grafting technology was found suitable for promotion and application in commercial production of watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1649 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

grafting · Fusarium · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.