Paper · 1980 · Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

Control of brown rot and transit rot of peaches with post-harvest fungicidal dips.

JB Heaton

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In 17 trials conducted between 1972 and 1977 in the Grnnite Belt fruit growing area near Stanthorpe in south-eastern Queensland, benomyl, carbendazim, iprodione, triforine and A6770 were the most effective of the fungicides applied as post-harvest dips for the control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) of peaches. Transit rot (Rhizopus stolonifer) was contrGlled by dicloran, A6770 and to a lesser extent iprodione.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl was among the most effective dips against peach brown rot.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Treatment
benomyle0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
brown rot (Monilinia fructicola)e0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benomyl, carbendazim, iprodione, triforine and A6770 were the most effective of the fungicides applied as post-harvest dips for the control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) of peaches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim was among the most effective dips against peach brown rot.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
brown rot (Monilinia fructicola)e0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benomyl, carbendazim, iprodione, triforine and A6770 were the most effective of the fungicides applied as post-harvest dips for the control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) of peaches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione was among the most effective dips against peach brown rot.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Treatment
iprodionee0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
brown rot (Monilinia fructicola)e0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benomyl, carbendazim, iprodione, triforine and A6770 were the most effective of the fungicides applied as post-harvest dips for the control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) of peaches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triforine was among the most effective dips against peach brown rot.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Treatment
triforinee0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
brown rot (Monilinia fructicola)e0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benomyl, carbendazim, iprodione, triforine and A6770 were the most effective of the fungicides applied as post-harvest dips for the control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) of peaches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A6770 was among the most effective dips against peach brown rot.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Treatment
A6770e0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
brown rot (Monilinia fructicola)e0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benomyl, carbendazim, iprodione, triforine and A6770 were the most effective of the fungicides applied as post-harvest dips for the control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) of peaches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicloran controlled peach transit rot.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0t0
Treatment
diclorane0t0
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0t0pathogen
Outcome
Transit rot (Rhizopus stolonifer)e0t0
Direction
contrGllede0t0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transit rot (Rhizopus stolonifer) was contrGlled by dicloran, A6770 and to a lesser extent iprodione.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A6770 controlled peach transit rot.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0t0
Treatment
A6770e0t0
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0t0pathogen
Outcome
Transit rot (Rhizopus stolonifer)e0t0
Direction
contrGllede0t0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transit rot (Rhizopus stolonifer) was contrGlled by dicloran, A6770 and to a lesser extent iprodione.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione controlled peach transit rot to a lesser extent.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0t0
Treatment
iprodionee0t0
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0t0pathogen
Outcome
Transit rot (Rhizopus stolonifer)e0t0
Direction
contrGllede0t0
Qualifier
to a lesser extente0t0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transit rot (Rhizopus stolonifer) was contrGlled by dicloran, A6770 and to a lesser extent iprodione.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑

benomyl · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

carbendazim · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iprodione · Rhizopus stolonifer · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iprodione · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.