Abstract
Fruit rot, besides causing losses in production, reduces the final quality of the product interfering in the commercialization. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of alternative products applied to pre-harvest for control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) and soft rot (Rhizopus spp.) In peaches. The experiment was conducted in the municipality of Nepomuceno-MG, in a peach orchard of the cultivar Diamante. The experimental design was a randomized block design with 7 treatments and 3 replicates, with field plots formed by 12 plants (arranged in 3 rows), being considered for the evaluations only the two central plants. Three applications were made at flowering and at 21; 7 and 3 days before harvest, with solutions containing the following treatments: 1-Clove oil 0.1%; 2-silicate clay 1.5%; 3-Phosphite K 0.20%; 4-Benzalkonium chloride 0.25%; 5-Azoxystrobin 0.02%; 6-Iprodione 0.15%; 7-Witness (water only). Treatments 4 and 5 were applied only at 21 and 7 days before harvest. Ten fruits were selected and placed in sterile trays under uncontrolled conditions, with disease evaluations at 3 and 6 days after the beginning of storage in 2005 and at 3; 6 and 9 days in 2006. The iprodione controlled the incidence of M. fructicola and had no effect on Rhizopus spp. Clove oil controlled the incidence and severity of M. fructicola by the fifth day and Rhizopus spp. by the sixth day. The phosphites of k, benzalkonium chloride and azoxystrobin were efficient in controlling the incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp. and had no effect on M. fructicola.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Iprodione controlled M. fructicola incidence.
- Taxon
- peaches
Prunus persicae1 - Treatment
- iprodionee0
- Interactor
- M. fructicola
Monilinia fructicolae0pathogen - Outcome
- incidence of M. fructicolae0
- Direction
- controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The iprodione controlled the incidence of M. fructicola”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
Iprodione had no effect on Rhizopus spp.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- iprodionee0
- Outcome
- Rhizopus spp.e0
- Direction
- no effecte0
_spores%2C_which_is_green_using_Light_Microscope%2C_Normal_image_without_any_coloring_or_processing_By_researcher_El_sayed_Al_gayar%2C_Faculty_of_Agriculture_Damietta_University.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
RhizopusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_spores%2C_which_is_green_using_Light_Microscope%2C_Normal_image_without_any_coloring_or_processing_By_researcher_El_sayed_Al_gayar%2C_Faculty_of_Agriculture_Damietta_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The iprodione controlled the incidence of M. fructicola and had no effect on Rhizopus spp.”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
Clove oil controlled M. fructicola incidence and severity by day five.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- Clove oile0
- Interactor
- M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
- Outcome
- incidence and severity of M. fructicolae0
- Direction
- controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Clove oil controlled the incidence and severity of M. fructicola by the fifth day”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
Clove oil controlled Rhizopus spp. by day six.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- Clove oile0
- Outcome
- Rhizopus spp.e0
- Direction
- controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Clove oil controlled the incidence and severity of M. fructicola by the fifth day and Rhizopus spp. by the sixth day”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
phosphites of k controlled Rhizopus incidence and severity.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- phosphites of ke0
- Outcome
- incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp.e0
- Direction
- controllinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphites of k, benzalkonium chloride and azoxystrobin were efficient in controlling the incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp. and had no effect on M. fructicola.”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
phosphites of k had no effect on M. fructicola.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- phosphites of ke0
- Interactor
- M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
- Outcome
- M. fructicolae0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphites of k, benzalkonium chloride and azoxystrobin were efficient in controlling the incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp. and had no effect on M. fructicola.”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
benzalkonium chloride controlled Rhizopus incidence and severity.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- benzalkonium chloridee0
- Outcome
- incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp.e0
- Direction
- controllinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphites of k, benzalkonium chloride and azoxystrobin were efficient in controlling the incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp. and had no effect on M. fructicola.”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
benzalkonium chloride had no effect on M. fructicola.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- benzalkonium chloridee0
- Interactor
- M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
- Outcome
- M. fructicolae0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphites of k, benzalkonium chloride and azoxystrobin were efficient in controlling the incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp. and had no effect on M. fructicola.”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
azoxystrobin controlled Rhizopus incidence and severity.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- azoxystrobine0
- Outcome
- incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp.e0
- Direction
- controllinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphites of k, benzalkonium chloride and azoxystrobin were efficient in controlling the incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp. and had no effect on M. fructicola.”
e1“In peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
azoxystrobin had no effect on M. fructicola.
- Taxon
- peachesPrunus persicae1
- Treatment
- azoxystrobine0
- Interactor
- M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
- Outcome
- M. fructicolae0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphites of k, benzalkonium chloride and azoxystrobin were efficient in controlling the incidence and severity of Rhizopus spp. and had no effect on M. fructicola.”
e1“In peaches”
The same questions in other papers
azoxystrobin · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →iprodione · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.