Paper · 1998 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Integration of insecticides and sex pheromones for management of major insect pests of cotton (Gossypium species) in Madhya Pradesh

M. P. Gupta; S. K. Shrivastava

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 1989-90 and 1990-91 on integrated approach of cotton (Gossypium sp) pest management. Three foliar sprays of insecticides (methyl demeton 0.04%, monocrotophos 0.05% and endosulfan 0.07%) and 6 sprays of insecticides (methyl demeton 0.04%, dimethoate 0.045%, monocrotophos 0.05%, endosulfan 0.07%, tliazophos 0.08% and endosulfan 0.07%), were. integrated with the plantation of synthetic sex pheromones of all 3 bollworms (Helicovelpa armigera Hubn., Earias spp and Pectinophora gossypiella Saun.) in less susceptible 'JKH 1' cotton hybrid during rainy (kharif) season at Harda, Madhya Pradesh. With the effective management of major sucking pests and bollworm pests highest seed-cotton yield and net profit were achieved from plots treated with 6 sprays of insecticides in integration with sex pheromones of all 3 bollworms followed by 3 sprays in integration with sex pheromones and 6 sprays of insecticides alone. However, the net profits were quite similar in treatments 3 sprays with sex pheromones and 6 sprays in alone. These findings based on multi-dimensional approach may be of great practical utility in cotton pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a cotton field trial at Harda, Madhya Pradesh, seed-cotton yield and net profit were highest with 6 insecticide sprays integrated with sex pheromones of the three bollworms, followed by 3 sprays with pheromones and 6 sprays of insecticides alone.

Treatment
6 sprays of insecticides in integration with sex pheromones of all 3 bollwormse0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
seed-cotton yield and net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
3 sprays in integration with sex pheromones and 6 sprays of insecticides alonee0
Setting
Harda, Madhya Pradeshe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pests of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest seed-cotton yield and net profit were achieved from plots treated with 6 sprays of insecticides in integration with sex pheromones of all 3 bollworms followed by 3 sprays in integration with sex pheromones and 6 sprays of insecticides alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Harda, Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net profits were quite similar between 3 sprays with sex pheromones and 6 sprays of insecticides alone.

Treatment
3 sprays with sex pheromonese0
Outcome
net profitse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
6 sprays in alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pests of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the net profits were quite similar in treatments 3 sprays with sex pheromones and 6 sprays in alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1058 · show in text ↑

pheromone · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pheromone · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

insecticide · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.