Paper · 1988 · Tropical Pest Management

Mating disruption for the control of pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiella(Saunders) in the delta cotton growing area of Egypt

M. A. El‐Adl; M. M. Hosny; D. G. Campion

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Hollow‐fibre, laminate‐flake and microencapsulated formulations of the synthetic sex pheromone (Z,Z) and (Z,E)‐7–11‐hexadecadienyl acetate of Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) were applied aerially in large scale trials in the Delta region of Egypt in 1985. 100 ha blocks of cotton were treated at regular intervals throughout the season as the only means of controlling the pest and compared with a 100 ha block of cotton sited in the same locality which was treated aerially with conventional insecticide spray applications. Comparisons of numbers of infested bolls, open boll counts and yields of seed cotton showed that adequate levels of control were achieved with all three pheromone formulations which were at least as effective as the insecticide sprays. The costs of the pheromone formulations and their aerial application also compared favourably with the insecticide programme. Greater numbers of beneficial insects were recorded in the pheromone‐treated areas than in the insecticide treated area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hollow-fibre, laminate-flake and microencapsulated pheromone formulations gave adequate control of pink bollworm in cotton, as measured by infested bolls, open boll counts and seed cotton yield, at least as effective as insecticide sprays in the Delta region of Egypt.

Treatment
pheromone formulationse0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
numbers of infested bolls, open boll counts and yields of seed cottone0
Direction
at least as effectivee0
Comparator
insecticide sprayse0
Setting
Delta region of Egypte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparisons of numbers of infested bolls, open boll counts and yields of seed cotton showed that adequate levels of control were achieved with all three pheromone formulations which were at least as effective as the insecticide sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delta region of Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–259 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The costs of the pheromone formulations and their aerial application compared favourably with the insecticide programme.

Treatment
pheromone formulationse0
Outcome
costse0
Direction
compared favourablye0
Comparator
insecticide programmee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“costs of the pheromone formulations and their aerial application also compared favourably with the insecticide programme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–898 · show in text ↑
t1

“delta cotton growing area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater numbers of beneficial insects were recorded in the pheromone-treated areas than in the insecticide-treated area.

Treatment
pheromonee0
Interactor
beneficial insectse0other
Outcome
numbers of beneficial insectse0
Direction
Greatere0
Comparator
insecticide treated areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater numbers of beneficial insects were recorded in the pheromone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“than in the insecticide treated area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1019 · show in text ↑
t1

“delta cotton growing area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–117 · show in text ↑

pheromone · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pheromone · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pheromone · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.