Abstract
Abstract Hollow‐fibre, laminate‐flake and microencapsulated formulations of the synthetic sex pheromone (Z,Z) and (Z,E)‐7–11‐hexadecadienyl acetate of Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) were applied aerially in large scale trials in the Delta region of Egypt in 1985. 100 ha blocks of cotton were treated at regular intervals throughout the season as the only means of controlling the pest and compared with a 100 ha block of cotton sited in the same locality which was treated aerially with conventional insecticide spray applications. Comparisons of numbers of infested bolls, open boll counts and yields of seed cotton showed that adequate levels of control were achieved with all three pheromone formulations which were at least as effective as the insecticide sprays. The costs of the pheromone formulations and their aerial application also compared favourably with the insecticide programme. Greater numbers of beneficial insects were recorded in the pheromone‐treated areas than in the insecticide treated area.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Hollow-fibre, laminate-flake and microencapsulated pheromone formulations gave adequate control of pink bollworm in cotton, as measured by infested bolls, open boll counts and seed cotton yield, at least as effective as insecticide sprays in the Delta region of Egypt.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- pheromone formulationse0
- Interactor
- pink bollworm
Pectinophora gossypiellat0pest - Outcome
- numbers of infested bolls, open boll counts and yields of seed cottone0
- Direction
- at least as effectivee0
- Comparator
- insecticide sprayse0
- Setting
- Delta region of Egypte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Comparisons of numbers of infested bolls, open boll counts and yields of seed cotton showed that adequate levels of control were achieved with all three pheromone formulations which were at least as effective as the insecticide sprays”
e1“Delta region of Egypt”
t0“pink bollworm”
Claim · model-written summary
The costs of the pheromone formulations and their aerial application compared favourably with the insecticide programme.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt1 - Treatment
- pheromone formulationse0
- Outcome
- costse0
- Direction
- compared favourablye0
- Comparator
- insecticide programmee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“costs of the pheromone formulations and their aerial application also compared favourably with the insecticide programme”
t1“delta cotton growing area”
Claim · model-written summary
Greater numbers of beneficial insects were recorded in the pheromone-treated areas than in the insecticide-treated area.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt1 - Treatment
- pheromonee0
- Interactor
- beneficial insectse0other
- Outcome
- numbers of beneficial insectse0
- Direction
- Greatere0
- Comparator
- insecticide treated areae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Greater numbers of beneficial insects were recorded in the pheromone”
e1“than in the insecticide treated area”
t1“delta cotton growing area”
The same questions in other papers
pheromone · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →pheromone · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →pheromone · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.