Paper · 2000 · 2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, USA, 4-8 January, 2000: Volume 2.

Subsurface injection versus surface application of composted municipal solid waste in cotton production.

Ahmad Khalilian; Michael J. Sullivan; Joachim D. Mueller; et al.

19
claims
36
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Equipment was developed and tested for injection and broadcast application of municipal solid waste (MSW) compost at selected rates to agricultural land for cotton production. Replicated tests were conducted to determine the effects of injected vs. broadcast applied compost on soil parameters (organic matter, soil compaction, and soil fertility) and plant growth. All broadcast application rates of compost significantly reduced hardpan formation in the top 6in. of soil compared to no compost application. In addition, all rates of injected material significantly reduced soil compaction in the Eand B-horizons (6-18 in.). Injected applications did not affect compaction in the top 6-in. of soil. Broadcast application of compost significantly increased soil organic matter content 6and 12-weeks-after planting proportional to the compost application rate. In addition, soil nitrogen content was significantly higher in the broadcast application plots 6-weeks-after planting. Twelve-weeks-after planting, only application of 12tons/acre compost (broadcast) statistically increased soil nitrogen content averaged over the top 8 in. of the soil. MSW compost (broadcast or injected) significantly increased plant N, P, and K contents compared to no compost application. Increases in plant nitrogen were proportional to application rates. In addition, injected application increased plant sulfur compared to no compost application. All rates of compost (injected or broadcast applications) significantly increased cotton lint yield compared to no compost application. Yield increase was proportional to application rates. For the 12 tons/acre injected application treatment, yield increases were 23%, 24%, and 44% in 1997, 98 and 99, respectively compared to no compost application. Compost significantly increased plant height. Height increase was proportional to application rate. Vitazyme increased plant N, P, and K contents with no effects on Ca, Mg, and S. Vitazyme increased cotton lint yield 31 lb/acre or 3%. In addition, soil nitrogen content 6-weeks-after planting in plots treated with Vitazyme was 12% higher than no-Vitazyme plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast compost reduced hardpan formation in topsoil.

Treatment
broadcast application rates of composte0
Outcome
hardpan formatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All broadcast application rates of compost significantly reduced hardpan formation in the top 6in. of soil compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected compost reduced soil compaction in E and B horizons.

Treatment
injected materiale0
Outcome
soil compactione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all rates of injected material significantly reduced soil compaction in the Eand B-horizons (6-18 in.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected compost did not affect topsoil compaction.

Treatment
Injected applicationse0
Outcome
compactione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injected applications did not affect compaction in the top 6-in. of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast compost increased soil organic matter in proportion to dose.

Treatment
Broadcast application of composte0
Outcome
soil organic matter contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast application of compost significantly increased soil organic matter content 6and 12-weeks-after planting proportional to the compost application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast plots had higher soil N six weeks after planting.

Treatment
broadcast applicatione0
Outcome
soil nitrogen contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil nitrogen content was significantly higher in the broadcast application plots 6-weeks-after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At twelve weeks, only broadcast 12 tons per acre increased soil N.

Treatment
12tons/acre compost (broadcast)e0
Outcome
soil nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only application of 12tons/acre compost (broadcast) statistically increased soil nitrogen content averaged over the top 8 in. of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast or injected compost increased plant N, P and K.

Treatment
MSW compost (broadcast or injected)e0
Outcome
plant N, P, and K contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSW compost (broadcast or injected) significantly increased plant N, P, and K contents compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nitrogen gains were proportional to compost rate.

Treatment
application ratese0
Outcome
plant nitrogene0
Direction
Increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in plant nitrogen were proportional to application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected compost increased plant sulfur.

Treatment
injected applicatione0
Outcome
plant sulfure0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“injected application increased plant sulfur compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All compost rates increased lint yield.

Treatment
compost (injected or broadcast applications)e0
Outcome
cotton lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All rates of compost (injected or broadcast applications) significantly increased cotton lint yield compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1565 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increase was proportional to compost rate.

Treatment
application ratese0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increase was proportional to application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected 12 tons per acre raised yield 23% in 1997.

Treatment
12 tons/acre injected application treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
23%e0
Qualifier
1997e0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the 12 tons/acre injected application treatment, yield increases were 23%, 24%, and 44% in 1997, 98 and 99, respectively compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1780 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected 12 tons per acre raised yield 24% in 98.

Treatment
12 tons/acre injected application treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
24%e0
Qualifier
98e0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the 12 tons/acre injected application treatment, yield increases were 23%, 24%, and 44% in 1997, 98 and 99, respectively compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1780 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected 12 tons per acre raised yield 44% in 99.

Treatment
12 tons/acre injected application treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
44%e0
Qualifier
99e0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the 12 tons/acre injected application treatment, yield increases were 23%, 24%, and 44% in 1997, 98 and 99, respectively compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1780 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased plant height in proportion to dose.

Treatment
Composte0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost significantly increased plant height. Height increase was proportional to application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1880 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitazyme increased plant N, P and K.

Treatment
Vitazymee0
Outcome
plant N, P, and K contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitazyme increased plant N, P, and K contents with no effects on Ca, Mg, and S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–1960 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitazyme had no effect on plant Ca, Mg or S.

Treatment
Vitazymee0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, and Se0
Direction
no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitazyme increased plant N, P, and K contents with no effects on Ca, Mg, and S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–1960 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitazyme increased cotton lint yield by 31 lb/acre, or 3%.

Treatment
Vitazymee0
Outcome
cotton lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31 lb/acree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitazyme increased cotton lint yield 31 lb/acre or 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitazyme increased soil N at six weeks by 12%.

Treatment
Vitazymee0
Outcome
soil nitrogen contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
no-Vitazyme plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil nitrogen content 6-weeks-after planting in plots treated with Vitazyme was 12% higher than no-Vitazyme plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2143 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑

transplanting · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.