Paper · 2021 · Environmental Challenges

The effect of minimum tillage and animal manure on maize yields and soil organic carbon in sub‐Saharan Africa: A meta‐analysis

M.W. Githongo; M.N. Kiboi; F.K. Ngetich; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
35
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), diminishing soil fertility has been experienced from continuous cropping and low nutrient replacement. Organic inputs and minimum tillage are proposed to increase the declining fertility of the soil to increase crop growth and yields. We reviewed animal manure and minimum tillage use on maize yields and soil organic carbon (SOC) in SSA. This involved a meta-analysis on the influence of minimum tillage and animal manure on maize grain yields and SOC. The peer-reviewed publications on animal manure and minimum tillage influence on maize yields and SOC were selected from articles that contained one or multiples of the following keywords, 'tillage, minimum tillage, conventional tillage, organic, manure, animal manure' using ScienceDirect database. Reported data on maize yields and soil organic carbon were extracted from figures, tables, and text, of the selected studies. These studies were analyzed using R, and results were presented in a forest plot. Minimum tillage had no significant influence on maize yields and soil organic carbon. Animal manure significantly improved maize yields and soil organic carbon. The study underscored the importance of animal manure in improving maize yields and soil organic carbon in SSA. Animal manure application in maize cropping systems is plausible to increase maize yields and soil organic carbon in SSA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage had no significant influence on maize yields in the meta-analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Outcome
maize yieldse0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage had no significant influence on maize yields and soil organic carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage had no significant influence on soil organic carbon in the meta-analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage had no significant influence on maize yields and soil organic carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal manure had improved on maize yields in the meta-analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Animal manuree0
Outcome
maize yieldse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Animal manure significantly improved maize yields and soil organic carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal manure had improved on soil organic carbon in the meta-analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Animal manuree0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Animal manure significantly improved maize yields and soil organic carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1151 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest animal manure application to increase maize yields and soil organic carbon in SSA.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Animal manure application in maize cropping systemse0
Setting
SSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Animal manure application in maize cropping systems is plausible to increase maize yields and soil organic carbon in SSA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1385 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.