Paper · 2013 · Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences(An International Journal)

Bio-efficacy of tolfenpyrad against aphid (Aphisgossypii Glover) infesting okra in Rajasthan

NK Bajpai; Hemant Swami; K. L. Jeengar

8
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three dosages of the tolfenpyrad 15% EC, viz. 100, 125 and 150 g along with two treated checks i.e., imidacloprid 17.85 SL @ 22.5 g and acetamiprid 20% WP @ 20 g ai ha−1 and untreated check were evaluated against okra aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in okra during kharif and rabi 2008–2009. All the treatments were significantly superior over untreated check. Among the treatments, maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason. Similarly, in rabi season at 3 days after first spray, tolfenpyrad @ 150 g gave maximum reduction (92.7%), followed by 90.6 and 90% in imidacloprid and acetamiprid, respectively. The least aphid count was recorded in tolfenpyrad 15% @ 150 g and imidacloprid 17.85 SL @ 22.5 g ai ha-1, followed by acetamiprid 20% WP @ 20 g ai ha-1. The natural enemies ’fauna in okra ecosystem had non significant difference among treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticide treatments were significantly superior to untreated check against okra aphid.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments were significantly superior over untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolfenpyrad 150 g reduced kharif aphid population by up to 90.3 to 100%.

Treatment
tolfenpyrad @ 150 ge0
Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
90.3 to 100%e0
Comparator
untreated checkt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“untreated check were evaluated against okra aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 22.5 g reduced kharif aphid population by up to 90.3 to 100%.

Treatment
imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1e0
Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
90.3 to 100%e0
Comparator
untreated checkt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“untreated check were evaluated against okra aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolfenpyrad 150 g reduced rabi aphid population by 92.7%.

Treatment
tolfenpyrad @ 150 ge0
Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
reductione0
Value
92.7%e0
Comparator
untreated checkt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tolfenpyrad @ 150 g gave maximum reduction (92.7%), followed by 90.6 and 90% in imidacloprid and acetamiprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“untreated check were evaluated against okra aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced rabi aphid population by 90.6%.

Treatment
imidaclopride0
Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
reductione0
Value
90.6e0
Comparator
untreated checkt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tolfenpyrad @ 150 g gave maximum reduction (92.7%), followed by 90.6 and 90% in imidacloprid and acetamiprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“untreated check were evaluated against okra aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid reduced rabi aphid population by 90%.

Treatment
acetamipride0
Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
reductione0
Value
90%e0
Comparator
untreated checkt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tolfenpyrad @ 150 g gave maximum reduction (92.7%), followed by 90.6 and 90% in imidacloprid and acetamiprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“untreated check were evaluated against okra aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum reduction ranged from 90.3 to 100% in aphid population were recorded after 3 and 7 days after spray in tolfenpyrad @ 150 g and imidacloprid 22.5 g ai ha−1 during kharifseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolfenpyrad and imidacloprid had the least aphid counts, followed by acetamiprid.

Treatment
tolfenpyrad 15% @ 150 ge0
Outcome
aphid counte0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
acetamiprid 20% WP @ 20 g ai ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The least aphid count was recorded in tolfenpyrad 15% @ 150 g and imidacloprid 17.85 SL @ 22.5 g ai ha-1, followed by acetamiprid 20% WP @ 20 g ai ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural enemy fauna did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
natural enemies ’faunae0
Direction
non significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The natural enemies ’fauna in okra ecosystem had non significant difference among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–988 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · Aphis gossypii · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tolfenpyrad · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imidacloprid · Aphis gossypii · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.