Abstract
Efficacy of different acaricides against mite infesting okra revealed that among the all treatments, the most effective treatment was Fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016%, resulting in the lowest mite population, at par with Fenpyroximate 5 SC 0.003%. The next best treatment was Spirotetramat 15.3 OD 0.018%, which was at par with Diafenthiuron 50 WP 0.060%. Spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.023% was moderately effective, which was at par with bifenazate 22.6 SC 0.006% and Etoxazole 10 SC 0.008%. Spirotetramat 11.01 + Imidacloprid 11.01 SC 0.02202% and Propergite 50 + Bifenthrin 5 SE 0.1265% were less effective. However, the highest mite population was recorded from the control plot. Out of the nine acaricidal treatments evaluated, fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% proved to be the most effective against okra mite. It exhibited the lowest mitepopulation, maximum fruit yield, and highest yield increase over the untreated control and the highest net return. Among the various acaricidal treatments, fenpyroximate 5 SC0.003% obtained the highest CBR (Cost Benefit Ratio) of 1:65.69, followed by fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% with CBR of 1:30.80.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% produced the lowest mite population, tied with Fenpyroximate 5 SC 0.003%.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016%e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae Koch
.jpg?width=60)
Tetranychus urticaet0pest - Outcome
- mite populatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- Fenpyroximate 5 SC 0.003%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the most effective treatment was Fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016%, resulting in the lowest mite population, at par with Fenpyroximate 5 SC 0.003%”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Spirotetramat 15.3 OD 0.018% was the next best mite treatment, tied with Diafenthiuron 50 WP 0.060%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Spirotetramat 15.3 OD 0.018%e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet0pest
- Outcome
- next best treatmente0
- Direction
- next beste0
- Comparator
- Diafenthiuron 50 WP 0.060%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next best treatment was Spirotetramat 15.3 OD 0.018%, which was at par with Diafenthiuron 50 WP 0.060%.”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.023% was moderately effective and tied with bifenazate and Etoxazole.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.023%e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet0pest
- Outcome
- moderately effectivee0
- Direction
- moderately effectivee0
- Comparator
- bifenazate 22.6 SC 0.006% and Etoxazole 10 SC 0.008%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.023% was moderately effective, which was at par with bifenazate 22.6 SC 0.006% and Etoxazole 10 SC 0.008%.”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Spirotetramat 11.01 + Imidacloprid 11.01 SC 0.02202% was less effective against okra mites.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Spirotetramat 11.01 + Imidacloprid 11.01 SC 0.02202%e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet0pest
- Outcome
- less effectivee0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spirotetramat 11.01 + Imidacloprid 11.01 SC 0.02202% and Propergite 50 + Bifenthrin 5 SE 0.1265% were less effective.”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Propergite 50 + Bifenthrin 5 SE 0.1265% was less effective against okra mites.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Propergite 50 + Bifenthrin 5 SE 0.1265%e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet0pest
- Outcome
- less effectivee0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spirotetramat 11.01 + Imidacloprid 11.01 SC 0.02202% and Propergite 50 + Bifenthrin 5 SE 0.1265% were less effective.”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The control plot had the highest mite population.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- control plote0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet0pest
- Outcome
- mite populatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest mite population was recorded from the control plot”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% gave maximum okra fruit yield.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016%e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet0pest
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% proved to be the most effective against okra mite. It exhibited the lowest mitepopulation, maximum fruit yield, and highest yield increase over the untreated control and the highest net return.”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenazaquin produced the highest okra yield increase over untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016%e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet0pest
- Outcome
- yield increasee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% proved to be the most effective against okra mite. It exhibited the lowest mitepopulation, maximum fruit yield, and highest yield increase over the untreated control and the highest net return.”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenazaquin produced the highest net return.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016%e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% proved to be the most effective against okra mite. It exhibited the lowest mitepopulation, maximum fruit yield, and highest yield increase over the untreated control and the highest net return.”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenpyroximate 5 SC0.003% had the highest cost-benefit ratio, 1:65.69.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- fenpyroximate 5 SC0.003%e0
- Outcome
- CBR (Cost Benefit Ratio)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1:65.69e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fenpyroximate 5 SC0.003% obtained the highest CBR (Cost Benefit Ratio) of 1:65.69”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% had the second-ranked cost-benefit ratio, 1:30.80.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016%e0
- Outcome
- CBRe0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1:30.80e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by fenazaquin 10 EC 0.016% with CBR of 1:30.80”
e1“highest CBR (Cost Benefit Ratio)”
t0“Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra”
The same questions in other papers
bifenthrin · Tetranychus urticae · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
spiromesifen · Tetranychus urticae · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fenazaquin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fenazaquin · Tetranychus urticae · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.