Abstract
Abstract In order to evaluate of nano-fertilizer and different irrigation regimes effects on yield and components yield and water use efficiency in Dill (Anethum graveolens L.), an experimental was conducted as factorial based on completely randomized design with three replications during 2015 at agriculture greenhouse of Payame Noor university. Treatments were irrigation interval with five levels (5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 days) and iron nano-fertilizer in two levels (no fertilizer and iron nano-fertilizer amount of four liters per hectare with irrigation water), respectively. Analysis of variance showed that the effect of the simple effects of iron nano-fertilizer and irrigation levels on yield, yield components and water use economic and environmental efficiency was significant. Mean comparison showed using iron nano-fertilizer can improve yield and components yield and water use economic and environmental efficiency in dill. The highest and lowest seed yield and components yield (such as 1000-seed weight, seeds per plant, number of node and number of branches) were achieved by irrigation interval five and 13 days. By increasing irrigation interval and applying drought stress, traits of quantitative yield (biomass yield and seed yield) and qualitative yield (essential oil yield) were significantly reduced. According to the results of research, application iron nano-fertilizer and irrigation interval seven days in dill led to created favorable conditions for increasing quantity and quality yield and water use efficiency. It can be replaced with nano fertilizers instead of chemical fertilizers that it was leading to sustainable agriculture and environmental protection.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Iron nano-fertilizer and irrigation level significantly affected yield, yield components, and water use economic and environmental efficiency.
- Treatment
- iron nano-fertilizer and irrigation levelse0
- Outcome
- yield, yield components and water use economic and environmental efficiencye0
Not reportedTaxonDirection
Verbatim
e0“the effect of the simple effects of iron nano-fertilizer and irrigation levels on yield, yield components and water use economic and environmental efficiency was significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron nano-fertilizer improved dill yield, yield components, and water use economic and environmental efficiency.
- Taxon
- dill
Anethum graveolense0 - Treatment
- iron nano-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yield and components yield and water use economic and environmental efficiencye0
- Direction
- improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using iron nano-fertilizer can improve yield and components yield and water use economic and environmental efficiency in dill”
Claim · model-written summary
Five-day irrigation gave the highest seed yield and yield components, whereas 13-day irrigation gave the lowest.
- Treatment
- irrigation interval five and 13 dayse0
- Outcome
- seed yield and components yielde0
- Direction
- highest and loweste0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest and lowest seed yield and components yield (such as 1000-seed weight, seeds per plant, number of node and number of branches) were achieved by irrigation interval five and 13 days”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the irrigation interval significantly reduced biomass yield.
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation interval and applying drought stresse0
- Outcome
- biomass yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“By increasing irrigation interval and applying drought stress, traits of quantitative yield (biomass yield and seed yield) and qualitative yield (essential oil yield) were significantly reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the irrigation interval significantly reduced seed yield.
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation interval and applying drought stresse0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“By increasing irrigation interval and applying drought stress, traits of quantitative yield (biomass yield and seed yield) and qualitative yield (essential oil yield) were significantly reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the irrigation interval significantly reduced essential oil yield.
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation interval and applying drought stresse0
- Outcome
- essential oil yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“By increasing irrigation interval and applying drought stress, traits of quantitative yield (biomass yield and seed yield) and qualitative yield (essential oil yield) were significantly reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron nano-fertilizer with seven-day irrigation created favorable conditions for higher yield and water use efficiency in dill.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolense0
- Treatment
- iron nano-fertilizer and irrigation interval seven dayse0
- Outcome
- increasing quantity and quality yield and water use efficiencye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application iron nano-fertilizer and irrigation interval seven days in dill led to created favorable conditions for increasing quantity and quality yield and water use efficiency”
The same questions in other papers
drought · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
irrigation · quality: oil · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →irrigation · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.