Paper · 2023 · The Journal Agriculture and Forestry

FOLIAR SPRAY OF SALICYLIC ACID IMPROVED YIELD PARAMETERS AND ESSENTIAL OIL PRODUCTION OF DILL UNDER WATER DEFICIT

Roghayeh SOLHI-KHAJEHMARJAN; Kazem GHASSEMI-GOLEZANI

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress causes physiological disorders and growth restriction, leading to a decrease in crop productivity in the field.Foliar spray of salicylic acid may reduce the adverse effects of this stress on plant performance.Thus, this experiment was laid out as split plot with RCB design in three replicates to assess changes in morpho-physiological traits and essential oil production of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) seeds in response to irrigation intervals (water supply after 70, 100, 130, 160 mm evaporation) and foliar spray of water (control) and salicylic acid (0.6, 1.2 mM).The results showed that, plant height, plant biomass, seeds per umbel and plant were diminished due to water deficit, leading to a decline in seed yield.1000-seed weight was slightly increased under stress, indicating the extent of drought tolerance of dill plants.Application of salicylic acid improved plant height, branches per plant, leaves per plant, umbels per plant, 1000-seed weight, plant biomass and finally seed yield under different irrigation intervals, especially under water limitation.Essential oil content and yield of seeds were increased with decreasing water supply up to moderate stress.The percentage and yield of essential oil were enhanced up to 54 days after flowering, and thereafter were slightly reduced.In general, application of 1.2 mM salicylic acid on non-stressed and drought-stressed plants was the superior treatment to improve field performance and essential oil production of dill.Therefore, drought tolerance and performance of plants can be promoted by salicylic acid treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit diminished dill height, biomass and seeds per umbel and plant.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
plant height, plant biomass, seeds per umbel and plante0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, plant biomass, seeds per umbel and plant were diminished due to water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased dill seed yield.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit, leading to a decline in seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–736 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress slightly increased 1000-seed weight.

Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-seed weight was slightly increased under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid improved dill height, branches, leaves and umbels across irrigation intervals.

Treatment
salicylic acide0
Outcome
plant height, branches per plant, leaves per plant, umbels per plante0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of salicylic acid improved plant height, branches per plant, leaves per plant, umbels per plant, 1000-seed weight, plant biomass and finally seed yield under different irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid improved 1000-seed weight, biomass and seed yield.

Treatment
salicylic acide0
Outcome
1000-seed weight, plant biomass and finally seed yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of salicylic acid improved plant height, branches per plant, leaves per plant, umbels per plant, 1000-seed weight, plant biomass and finally seed yield under different irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate reduction in water supply increased seed essential oil content and yield.

Treatment
decreasing water supplye0
Outcome
Essential oil content and yield of seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to moderate stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Essential oil content and yield of seeds were increased with decreasing water supply up to moderate stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil percentage and yield increased up to 54 days after flowering.

Outcome
percentage and yield of essential oile0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
up to 54 days after floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage and yield of essential oil were enhanced up to 54 days after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil percentage and yield declined slightly after 54 days after flowering.

Outcome
percentage and yield of essential oile1
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
thereaftere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up to 54 days after flowering, and thereafter were slightly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1315 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percentage and yield of essential oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1233 · show in text ↑
e2

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–418 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 1.2 mM salicylic acid as the superior treatment for field performance and essential oil production.

Treatment
1.2 mM salicylic acide0
Outcome
application of 1.2 mM salicylic acide0
Qualifier
non-stressed and drought-stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 1.2 mM salicylic acid on non-stressed and drought-stressed plants was the superior treatment to improve field performance and essential oil production of dill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1501 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: oil · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.