Paper · 2019 · Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo

Yield of biomass and essential oil of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) grown under irrigation

Vera Popović; Livija Maksimović; Dušan Adamović; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dill (Anethum graveolens L.) is a one-year herbaceous, spicy plant, which has aromatic smell and taste. One of its important ingredients is essential oil. The experiment showing the effect of irrigation on essential oil and biomass yield of dill was conducted in rainy 2016 and dry 2017 in two variants: control (without irrigation) and variant with irrigation. Favourable water balance of the soil was provided by applying drop-by-drop irrigation method. The average yield of fresh biomass was 8,252 kg ha-1 (10,194 kg ha-1 under irrigation and 6,310 kg ha-1 in control). Under irrigation, the yield of biomass was higher than the control variant by 78.59% in 2017 and 47.41% in 2016. Under irrigation, essential oil content and yield were higher than the control by 10.73% and 95.97% in 2017, respectively, and 3.93% and 54.06% in 2016, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised dill biomass yield over the control by 78.59% in 2017.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
yield of biomasse1
Direction
highere1
Value
78.59%e1
Comparator
control variante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under irrigation, the yield of biomass was higher than the control variant by 78.59% in 2017 and 47.41% in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised dill biomass yield over the control by 47.41% in 2016.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
yield of biomasse1
Direction
highere1
Value
47.41%e1
Comparator
control variante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under irrigation, the yield of biomass was higher than the control variant by 78.59% in 2017 and 47.41% in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised dill essential oil content over the control by 10.73% in 2017.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
irrigatione2
Outcome
essential oil contente2
Direction
highere2
Value
10.73%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under irrigation, essential oil content and yield were higher than the control by 10.73% and 95.97% in 2017, respectively, and 3.93% and 54.06% in 2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised dill essential oil yield over the control by 95.97% in 2017.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
irrigatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
95.97%e2
Qualifier
essential oile2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under irrigation, essential oil content and yield were higher than the control by 10.73% and 95.97% in 2017, respectively, and 3.93% and 54.06% in 2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised dill essential oil content over the control by 3.93% in 2016.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
irrigatione2
Outcome
essential oil contente2
Direction
highere2
Value
3.93%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under irrigation, essential oil content and yield were higher than the control by 10.73% and 95.97% in 2017, respectively, and 3.93% and 54.06% in 2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised dill essential oil yield over the control by 54.06% in 2016.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
irrigatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
54.06%e2
Qualifier
essential oile2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under irrigation, essential oil content and yield were higher than the control by 10.73% and 95.97% in 2017, respectively, and 3.93% and 54.06% in 2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fresh biomass yield of dill was 8,252 kg/ha across treatments.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Outcome
average yield of fresh biomasse3
Value
8,252 kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
10,194 kg ha-1 under irrigation and 6,310 kg ha-1 in controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e3

“The average yield of fresh biomass was 8,252 kg ha-1 (10,194 kg ha-1 under irrigation and 6,310 kg ha-1 in control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–571 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: oil · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.