Paper · 2021 · Journal of Environmental Biology

Integration of salicylic acid, vermicompost and bioagent for effective management of chickpea wilt disease

S. Sahni; S. Kumar; B.D. Prasad

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of integration of salicylic acid, vermicompost and bioagent for effective management of chickpea wilt disease. Methodology: The effectiveness of salicylic acid and ZnSO4 unaided and in combination with Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and vermicompost were evaluated against Fusarium wilt of chickpea under natural condition. Three sets of experiment with nine treatments were conducted in earthen pots in completely randomized design. Ten seeds of wilt susceptible chickpea variety JG 62 were sown. Twenty-days-old plants were sprayed with salicylic acid (Set I), ZnSO4 (Set II) and distilled H2O (Set III). After 24 hr of foliar spray, the whole set of treatment was inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri inoculums, except uninoculated control. The number of wilted seedlings in each pot for each treatment were recorded at 10, 20 and 30 days post-inoculation (dpi) and compared with uninoculated pots. Results: The combined effect of vermicompost amendment @15% and pre-inoculation treatment of salicylic acid showed 0.00, 6.67 and 6.67% wilt incidence whereas treatments having ZnSO4 as pre-inoculation foliar spray resulted in 0.00, 13.33 and 13.33% wilt incidence at 10, 20 and 30 dpi, respectively. Further, the combined treatment of 15% vermicompost along with seed bacterization and pre-inoculation foliar spray of salicylic acid showed complete protection against F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri. The beneficial effect of vermicompost and PGPR isolate on root and shoot length, and fresh and dry weight of chickpea plants were also observed. Interpretation: High potential for integrating vermicompost, bioagent and foliar application of salicylic acid to surrogate chemical fungicides for eco-friendly and sustainable management of wilt disease in chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus salicylic acid gave 0.00%, 6.67%, and 6.67% wilt incidence at 10, 20, and 30 days.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost amendment @15% and pre-inoculation treatment of salicylic acide0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Value
0.00, 6.67 and 6.67%e0

Not reportedInteractorComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined effect of vermicompost amendment @15% and pre-inoculation treatment of salicylic acid showed 0.00, 6.67 and 6.67% wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus ZnSO4 gave 0.00%, 13.33%, and 13.33% wilt incidence at 10, 20, and 30 days.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ZnSO4 as pre-inoculation foliar spraye0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Value
0.00, 13.33 and 13.33%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatments having ZnSO4 as pre-inoculation foliar spray resulted in 0.00, 13.33 and 13.33% wilt incidence at 10, 20 and 30 dpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, seed bacterization, and salicylic acid completely protected chickpea against Fusarium wilt.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
15% vermicompost along with seed bacterization and pre-inoculation foliar spray of salicylic acide0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
complete protection against F. oxysporum f. sp. cicerie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combined treatment of 15% vermicompost along with seed bacterization and pre-inoculation foliar spray of salicylic acid showed complete protection against F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost and PGPR benefited chickpea root and shoot length and fresh weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
vermicompost and PGPR isolatee0
Outcome
root and shoot lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The beneficial effect of vermicompost and PGPR isolate on root and shoot length, and fresh and dry weight of chickpea plants were also observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost and PGPR benefited chickpea dry weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
vermicompost and PGPR isolatee0
Outcome
dry weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The beneficial effect of vermicompost and PGPR isolate on root and shoot length, and fresh and dry weight of chickpea plants were also observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1630 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · Fusarium oxysporum · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

fertilization · Fusarium oxysporum · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · Fusarium oxysporum · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.