Paper · 2021 · Plant Biotechnology Journal

Suppressing chlorophyll degradation by silencing OsNYC3 improves rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani, the causal agent of sheath blight

Wenlei Cao; Huimin Zhang; Yong Zhou; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
63
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia solani Kühn (R. solani) causes serious diseases in many crops worldwide, including rice and maize sheath blight (ShB). Crop resistance to the fungus is a quantitative trait and resistance mechanism remains largely unknown, severely hindering the progress on developing resistant varieties. In this study, we found that resistant variety YSBR1 has apparently stronger ability to suppress the expansion of R. solani than susceptible Lemont in both field and growth chamber conditions. Comparison of transcriptomic profiles shows that the photosynthetic system including chlorophyll biosynthesis is highly suppressed by R. solani in Lemont but weakly in YSBR1. YSBR1 shows higher chlorophyll content than that of Lemont, and inducing chlorophyll degradation by dark treatment significantly reduces its resistance. Furthermore, three rice mutants and one maize mutant that carry impaired chlorophyll biosynthesis all display enhanced susceptibility to R. solani. Overexpression of OsNYC3, a chlorophyll degradation gene apparently induced expression by R. solani infection, significantly enhanced ShB susceptibility in a high-yield ShB-susceptible variety '9522'. However, silencing its transcription apparently improves ShB resistance without compromising agronomic traits or yield in field tests. Interestingly, altering chlorophyll content does not affect rice resistance to blight and blast diseases, caused by biotrophic and hemi-biotrophic pathogens, respectively. Our study reveals that chlorophyll plays an important role in ShB resistance and suppressing chlorophyll degradation induced by R. solani infection apparently improves rice ShB resistance. This discovery provides a novel target for developing resistant crop to necrotrophic fungus R. solani.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant rice variety YSBR1 suppressed R. solani expansion more strongly than susceptible Lemont in field and chamber conditions.

Material
YSBR1e0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
expansion of R. solanie0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
Lemonte0
Setting
field and growth chamber conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistant variety YSBR1 has apparently stronger ability to suppress the expansion of R. solani than susceptible Lemont in both field and growth chamber conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani strongly suppressed the photosynthetic system including chlorophyll biosynthesis in Lemont but weakly in YSBR1.

Material
Lemonte0
Treatment
R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
photosynthetic system including chlorophyll biosynthesise0
Direction
highly suppressede0
Comparator
YSBR1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic system including chlorophyll biosynthesis is highly suppressed by R. solani in Lemont but weakly in YSBR1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YSBR1 had higher chlorophyll content than Lemont.

Material
YSBR1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Lemonte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“YSBR1 shows higher chlorophyll content than that of Lemont”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark-induced chlorophyll degradation significantly reduced YSBR1 resistance.

Treatment
dark treatmente0
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inducing chlorophyll degradation by dark treatment significantly reduces its resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three rice mutants with impaired chlorophyll biosynthesis showed enhanced susceptibility to R. solani.

Material
three rice mutantse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to R. solanie0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three rice mutants and one maize mutant that carry impaired chlorophyll biosynthesis all display enhanced susceptibility to R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–989 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One maize mutant with impaired chlorophyll biosynthesis showed enhanced susceptibility to R. solani.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
one maize mutante0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to R. solanie0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three rice mutants and one maize mutant that carry impaired chlorophyll biosynthesis all display enhanced susceptibility to R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–989 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani infection apparently induced OsNYC3 expression.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Gene
OsNYC3e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
inducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OsNYC3, a chlorophyll degradation gene apparently induced expression by R. solani infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNYC3 overexpression significantly increased sheath blight susceptibility in variety 9522.

Material
9522e0
Treatment
Overexpression of OsNYC3e0
Gene
OsNYC3e0
Outcome
ShB susceptibilitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overexpression of OsNYC3, a chlorophyll degradation gene apparently induced expression by R. solani infection, significantly enhanced ShB susceptibility in a high-yield ShB-susceptible variety '9522'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNYC3 transcriptional silencing apparently improved sheath blight resistance.

Treatment
silencing its transcriptione0
Outcome
ShB resistancee0
Direction
improvese0
Setting
field testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silencing its transcription apparently improves ShB resistance without compromising agronomic traits or yield in field tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNYC3 transcriptional silencing did not compromise agronomic traits or yield in field tests.

Treatment
silencing its transcriptione0
Outcome
agronomic traits or yielde0
Direction
without compromisinge0
Setting
field testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silencing its transcription apparently improves ShB resistance without compromising agronomic traits or yield in field tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing chlorophyll content did not affect rice resistance to blight and blast diseases.

Treatment
altering chlorophyll contente0
Interactor
biotrophic and hemi-biotrophic pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
rice resistance to blight and blast diseasese0
Direction
does not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“altering chlorophyll content does not affect rice resistance to blight and blast diseases, caused by biotrophic and hemi-biotrophic pathogens, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1497 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that chlorophyll has an important role in sheath blight resistance.

Outcome
ShB resistancee0
Qualifier
chlorophyll plays an important rolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll plays an important role in ShB resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–102 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia solani · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

light · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

loss of function · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 62 positive, 72 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

loss of function · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 86 positive, 68 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.