Paper · 2021 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management practices on greengram (Vigna radiata) crop

RAVINDRA TOMER; SANJEEV KUMAR; RAHUL KUMAR; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rainy season of 2015 and 2016 at Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur with the objective to evaluate the effects of different tillage and integrated nutrient management (INM) practices on performance of greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] under greengram + sesame intercropping system. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four tillage practices, viz. conventional tillage (CT), deep tillage (DT), CT + vegetative mulch and DT + vegetative mulch as main plots, and six INM practices, viz. 20-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha, 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha, 20-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha + Rhizobium (soil inoculation), 20-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha + Rhizobium + phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB), 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha + Rhizobium and 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha + Rhizobium + PSB as sub plots with three replications. The DT + vegetative mulch resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (3.10), crop dry matter (10.10 g/plant), seed yield (9.02 q/ha) and net returns (37314.5 INR/ha) with 4.03%, 3.17%, 24.24% and 43% increment over CT, respectively. Among the INM treatments, the 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSB resulted in highest leaf area index (3.09), crop dry matter (10.09 g/plant), seed yield (9.14 q/ha), net returns (33346.5 INR/ha), and nitrogen (17.67 kg/ha) and phosphorus (9.31 kg/ha) uptake by seed with mean 3.18%, 2.91%, 21.32%, 43.70%, 27.68% and 34.65% increase over sole application of chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched deep tillage increased leaf area index to 3.10.

Treatment
DT + vegetative mulche0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.10e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DT + vegetative mulch resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (3.10), crop dry matter (10.10 g/plant), seed yield (9.02 q/ha) and net returns (37314.5 INR/ha) with 4.03%, 3.17%, 24.24% and 43% increment over CT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched deep tillage increased crop dry matter to 10.10 g/plant.

Treatment
DT + vegetative mulche0
Outcome
crop dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.10 g/plante0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DT + vegetative mulch resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (3.10), crop dry matter (10.10 g/plant), seed yield (9.02 q/ha) and net returns (37314.5 INR/ha) with 4.03%, 3.17%, 24.24% and 43% increment over CT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched deep tillage increased seed yield to 9.02 q/ha.

Treatment
DT + vegetative mulche0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.02 q/hae0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DT + vegetative mulch resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (3.10), crop dry matter (10.10 g/plant), seed yield (9.02 q/ha) and net returns (37314.5 INR/ha) with 4.03%, 3.17%, 24.24% and 43% increment over CT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched deep tillage increased net returns to 37314.5 INR/ha.

Treatment
DT + vegetative mulche0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
37314.5 INR/hae0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DT + vegetative mulch resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (3.10), crop dry matter (10.10 g/plant), seed yield (9.02 q/ha) and net returns (37314.5 INR/ha) with 4.03%, 3.17%, 24.24% and 43% increment over CT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients with Rhizobium and PSB raised leaf area index to 3.09.

Treatment
30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.09e0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSB resulted in highest leaf area index (3.09), crop dry matter (10.09 g/plant), seed yield (9.14 q/ha), net returns (33346.5 INR/ha), and nitrogen (17.67 kg/ha) and phosphorus (9.31 kg/ha) uptake by seed with mean 3.18%, 2.91%, 21.32%, 43.70%, 27.68% and 34.65% increase over sole application of chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients with Rhizobium and PSB raised dry matter to 10.09 g/plant.

Treatment
30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
crop dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.09 g/plante0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSB resulted in highest leaf area index (3.09), crop dry matter (10.09 g/plant), seed yield (9.14 q/ha), net returns (33346.5 INR/ha), and nitrogen (17.67 kg/ha) and phosphorus (9.31 kg/ha) uptake by seed with mean 3.18%, 2.91%, 21.32%, 43.70%, 27.68% and 34.65% increase over sole application of chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients with Rhizobium and PSB raised seed yield to 9.14 q/ha.

Treatment
30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.14 q/hae0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSB resulted in highest leaf area index (3.09), crop dry matter (10.09 g/plant), seed yield (9.14 q/ha), net returns (33346.5 INR/ha), and nitrogen (17.67 kg/ha) and phosphorus (9.31 kg/ha) uptake by seed with mean 3.18%, 2.91%, 21.32%, 43.70%, 27.68% and 34.65% increase over sole application of chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients with Rhizobium and PSB raised net returns to 33346.5 INR/ha.

Treatment
30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
33346.5 INR/hae0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSB resulted in highest leaf area index (3.09), crop dry matter (10.09 g/plant), seed yield (9.14 q/ha), net returns (33346.5 INR/ha), and nitrogen (17.67 kg/ha) and phosphorus (9.31 kg/ha) uptake by seed with mean 3.18%, 2.91%, 21.32%, 43.70%, 27.68% and 34.65% increase over sole application of chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients with Rhizobium and PSB raised seed nitrogen uptake to 17.67 kg/ha.

Treatment
30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.67 kg/hae0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSB resulted in highest leaf area index (3.09), crop dry matter (10.09 g/plant), seed yield (9.14 q/ha), net returns (33346.5 INR/ha), and nitrogen (17.67 kg/ha) and phosphorus (9.31 kg/ha) uptake by seed with mean 3.18%, 2.91%, 21.32%, 43.70%, 27.68% and 34.65% increase over sole application of chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients with Rhizobium and PSB raised seed phosphorus uptake to 9.31 kg/ha.

Treatment
30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.31 kg/hae0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 30-60-40 N-P2O5-K2O kg/ha and Rhizobium + PSB resulted in highest leaf area index (3.09), crop dry matter (10.09 g/plant), seed yield (9.14 q/ha), net returns (33346.5 INR/ha), and nitrogen (17.67 kg/ha) and phosphorus (9.31 kg/ha) uptake by seed with mean 3.18%, 2.91%, 21.32%, 43.70%, 27.68% and 34.65% increase over sole application of chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1529 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

tillage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

mulching · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 60 positive, 1 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.