Paper · 2015 · Plant Growth Regulation

Plant growth promoting bacteria confer salt tolerance in Vigna radiata by up-regulating antioxidant defense and biological soil fertility

Faisal Islam; Tahira Yasmeen; Muhammad S. Arif; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
252
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity, a frequently occurring abiotic stress, is a major constraint for crop productivity worldwide. The present study was conducted to evaluate the ability of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Bacillus cereus Pb25, isolated from soil irrigated with saline water, to promote Vigna radiate (mungbean) growth in the absence and presence of salt stress (9 dS m −1 ). Results demonstrated that B. cereus promoted V. radiate plant growth significantly even in the presence of salt. Inoculations with PGPR improved the plant growth, and increased the root, shoot fresh and dry biomass and yield as compared to plants with no bacterial treatment (control). Results showed that both chlorophyll content and plant growth were inhibited by saline stress and the salt-induced oxidative damage (measured by MDA, H 2 O 2 ) was alleviated by PGPR inoculation. Furthermore, PGPR inoculation significantly increased the antioxidant enzymes (POD, SOD and CAT) activities and enhanced the accumulation of proline, potassium, nitrogen and phosphorus as well as decreased sodium accumulation in saline stressed plants. Regarding the soil biological activity, inoculated PGPR enhanced the activity of dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, microbial biomass carbon, available phosphorus and total organic carbon under saline stress as compared to saline treatment alone. These results suggest that B. cereus can be used in salinized agricultural lands as bio-inoculant to increase crop productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. cereus significantly promoted mungbean growth under salt stress.

Taxon
V. radiatee0
Treatment
B. cereuse0
Interactor
B. cereusBacillus cereuse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cereus promoted V. radiate plant growth significantly even in the presence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased root and shoot fresh and dry biomass relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Inoculations with PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
root, shoot fresh and dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
plants with no bacterial treatment (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations with PGPR improved the plant growth, and increased the root, shoot fresh and dry biomass and yield as compared to plants with no bacterial treatment (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased yield relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Inoculations with PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
plants with no bacterial treatment (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations with PGPR improved the plant growth, and increased the root, shoot fresh and dry biomass and yield as compared to plants with no bacterial treatment (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline stress inhibited chlorophyll content.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
saline stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both chlorophyll content and plant growth were inhibited by saline stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline stress inhibited plant growth.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
saline stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both chlorophyll content and plant growth were inhibited by saline stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation alleviated salt-induced oxidative damage.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
PGPR inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
salt-induced oxidative damagee0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt-induced oxidative damage (measured by MDA, H 2 O 2 ) was alleviated by PGPR inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation significantly increased POD, SOD and CAT activities.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
PGPR inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes (POD, SOD and CAT) activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR inoculation significantly increased the antioxidant enzymes (POD, SOD and CAT) activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation enhanced accumulation of proline, potassium and nitrogen.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
PGPR inoculatione0
Outcome
accumulation of proline, potassium, nitrogene0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR inoculation significantly increased the antioxidant enzymes (POD, SOD and CAT) activities and enhanced the accumulation of proline, potassium, nitrogen and phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation enhanced phosphorus accumulation.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
PGPR inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR inoculation significantly increased the antioxidant enzymes (POD, SOD and CAT) activities and enhanced the accumulation of proline, potassium, nitrogen and phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation decreased sodium accumulation.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
PGPR inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
sodium accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR inoculation significantly increased the antioxidant enzymes (POD, SOD and CAT) activities and enhanced the accumulation of proline, potassium, nitrogen and phosphorus as well as decreased sodium accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation enhanced soil dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase and microbial biomass carbon under salinity.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
activity of dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
saline treatment alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated PGPR enhanced the activity of dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, microbial biomass carbon, available phosphorus and total organic carbon under saline stress as compared to saline treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation enhanced soil available phosphorus and total organic carbon under salinity.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
available phosphorus and total organic carbone0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
saline treatment alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated PGPR enhanced the activity of dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, microbial biomass carbon, available phosphorus and total organic carbon under saline stress as compared to saline treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using B. cereus as a bio-inoculant on salinized agricultural land.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Interactor
B. cereusBacillus cereuse0symbiont
Outcome
bio-inoculant to increase crop productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cereus can be used in salinized agricultural lands as bio-inoculant to increase crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

salinity · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 4 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 60 positive, 1 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

inoculation · physiology: ion balance · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.