Paper · 2021 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response of INM in rice in rice–wheat cropping system

KAUTILYA CHAUDHARY; H C TRIPATHI; KULDEEP SINGH; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at the research farm of C.S. Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, UP during kharif of 2013-14 & 2014-15, to study the effect of INM on yield, nutrient contents and uptake of rice. The experiment was conducted with 11 treatments, viz. control, 100% NPK (RDF 120:60:40 kg/ha), 100% NPK + FYM 5 t/ha, 100% NPK + blue green algae (BGA), 100% NPK + FYM + BGA, 100% NPK + 40 kg S/ha, 100% NPK + 5 kg Zn/ha, 100% NPK + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha, 100% NPK + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ ha, 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha and 125% NPK in RBD replicated thrice. Results of this study revealed that among the different INM options significantly highest grain (5.27 t/ha), straw (6.23 t/ha) and biological yield (11.5 t/ha) with harvest index (45.8%) were recorded with 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha. Application of 100% NPK increased grain yield by 100% over control and further addition of FYM at the rate of 5 t/ha increased the yield by 2.75% compared to 100% RDF. The highest protein content, starch content and head rice recovery was recorded with application of 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The full nutrient treatment gave the highest grain yield of 5.27 t/ha.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/hae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.27 t/hae0
Comparator
different INM optionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of this study revealed that among the different INM options significantly highest grain (5.27 t/ha), straw (6.23 t/ha) and biological yield (11.5 t/ha) with harvest index (45.8%) were recorded with 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The full nutrient treatment gave the highest straw yield of 6.23 t/ha.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/hae0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.23 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of this study revealed that among the different INM options significantly highest grain (5.27 t/ha), straw (6.23 t/ha) and biological yield (11.5 t/ha) with harvest index (45.8%) were recorded with 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The full nutrient treatment gave the highest biological yield of 11.5 t/ha.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/hae0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.5 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of this study revealed that among the different INM options significantly highest grain (5.27 t/ha), straw (6.23 t/ha) and biological yield (11.5 t/ha) with harvest index (45.8%) were recorded with 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full nutrient treatment recorded a harvest index of 45.8%.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/hae0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Value
45.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (45.8%) were recorded with 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% NPK raised grain yield by 100% over control.

Treatment
100% NPKe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% NPK increased grain yield by 100% over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding FYM at 5 t/ha raised yield by 2.75% compared with 100% RDF.

Treatment
FYM at the rate of 5 t/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.75%e0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further addition of FYM at the rate of 5 t/ha increased the yield by 2.75% compared to 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full nutrient treatment recorded the highest protein content, starch content and head rice recovery.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/hae0
Outcome
protein content, starch content and head rice recoverye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest protein content, starch content and head rice recovery was recorded with application of 100% NPK + FYM + BGA + 40 kg S/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha + 10 kg Fe/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

71 papers: 57 positive, 14 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Iron toxicity reduced rice yields by 16–78 %, averaging 43 %.

    Rice Yield Gap due to Iron Toxicity in West Africa · 2008 · compared with referential yield obtained in a non‐iron‐toxic site

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

zinc atom · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Cyanobacteriota · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Cyanobacteriota · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 114 positive, 12 negative or no effect

113 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.