Paper · 2016 · Research on Crops

Long term effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and economics of rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) system in north-western Himalaya

Upinder Sharma; S. K. Subehia; S. S. Rana

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to study the integrated effect of nutrient management on rice and wheat yield and its economics in an on-going long term fertilizer experiment initiated during kharif 1991 at CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur. Eight treatments comprising control, 100% NPK (inorganic) and conjoint use of 50 and 75% NPK with 50 and 25% N substitution either through FYM, wheat straw or green manure Sesbania aculeata to rice (June-October) followed by 100 and 75% NPK through inorganics to wheat (November-May), respectively, were imposed since the inception of the experiment. Grain and straw yields of both the crops were recorded after 20th and 21st cropping cycles (2010–11 and 2011–12). The omission of chemical fertilizers and organics for last 20 years (control) resulted in significantly lower yield in comparison to rest of the treatments. Continuous substitution of 50% N through green manure with 50% NPK produced maximum rice grain (7.37 t/ha) and straw (6.21 t/ha) yield which was 16.8 and 14.8% higher over 100% NPK alone. In case of wheat, highest grain yield (3.64 t/ha) was recorded in treatment where 50% N was substituted through FYM to rice crop every year. The data further revealed that application of (i) 50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat, (ii) 100% NPK to both the crops and (iii) 50% NPK+50% N through green manure to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat gave significantly higher net returns (193, 170 and 163%, respectively) over control. The highest benefit: cost (B: C) ratio of 1.40 was recorded in treatment where 100% NPK was applied to both the crops followed by 1.22 in treatment where 50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat was applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated rice had significantly lower yield than treated rice.

Treatment
omission of chemical fertilizers and organicse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
last 20 yearse0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The omission of chemical fertilizers and organics for last 20 years (control) resulted in significantly lower yield in comparison to rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated wheat had significantly lower yield than treated wheat.

Treatment
omission of chemical fertilizers and organicse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The omission of chemical fertilizers and organics for last 20 years (control) resulted in significantly lower yield in comparison to rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-manure nitrogen substitution gave maximum rice grain yield of 7.37 t/ha, 16.8% above full NPK.

Treatment
50% N through green manure with 50% NPKe0
Outcome
rice graine0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.37 t/hae0
Qualifier
16.8e0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Continuous substitution of 50% N through green manure with 50% NPK produced maximum rice grain (7.37 t/ha) and straw (6.21 t/ha) yield which was 16.8 and 14.8% higher over 100% NPK alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-manure nitrogen substitution gave maximum rice straw yield of 6.21 t/ha, 14.8% above full NPK.

Treatment
50% N through green manure with 50% NPKe0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.21 t/hae0
Qualifier
14.8%e0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Continuous substitution of 50% N through green manure with 50% NPK produced maximum rice grain (7.37 t/ha) and straw (6.21 t/ha) yield which was 16.8 and 14.8% higher over 100% NPK alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual FYM substitution in rice gave the highest wheat grain yield, 3.64 t/ha.

Treatment
50% N was substituted through FYM to rice crop every yeare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.64 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“In case of wheat, highest grain yield (3.64 t/ha) was recorded in treatment where 50% N was substituted through FYM to rice crop every year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM to rice followed by full NPK to wheat raised net returns 193% above control.

Treatment
50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheate0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
193e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“(i) 50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat, (ii) 100% NPK to both the crops and (iii) 50% NPK+50% N through green manure to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat gave significantly higher net returns (193, 170 and 163%, respectively) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NPK to both crops raised net returns 170% above control.

Treatment
100% NPK to both the cropse0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
170e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“(i) 50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat, (ii) 100% NPK to both the crops and (iii) 50% NPK+50% N through green manure to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat gave significantly higher net returns (193, 170 and 163%, respectively) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure to rice followed by full NPK to wheat raised net returns 163% above control.

Treatment
50% NPK+50% N through green manure to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheate0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
163%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“(i) 50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat, (ii) 100% NPK to both the crops and (iii) 50% NPK+50% N through green manure to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat gave significantly higher net returns (193, 170 and 163%, respectively) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NPK to both crops yielded the highest benefit to cost ratio, 1.40.

Treatment
100% NPK was applied to both the cropse0
Outcome
benefit: cost (B: C) ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.40e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest benefit: cost (B: C) ratio of 1.40 was recorded in treatment where 100% NPK was applied to both the crops followed by 1.22 in treatment where 50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM to rice followed by full NPK to wheat gave a benefit to cost ratio of 1.22.

Treatment
50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheate0
Outcome
benefit: cost (B: C) ratioe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest benefit: cost (B: C) ratio of 1.40 was recorded in treatment where 100% NPK was applied to both the crops followed by 1.22 in treatment where 50% NPK+50% N through FYM to rice followed by 100% NPK to wheat was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1769 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

fertilization · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

135 papers: 113 positive, 22 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

131 papers more in this group

See all 135 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.