Paper · 2021 · PeerJ

Effects of drip tape modes on soil hydrothermal conditions and cotton yield (Gossypium hirsutumL.) under machine-harvest patterns

Dongwang Wang; Zhenhua Wang; Tingbo Lv; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: L.) planting technology. This study aims to demonstrate the effects of drip tape modes on soil hydrothermal conditions, cotton yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of machine-harvest cotton under mulch in Xinjiang. METHODS: A field experiment was conducted to set up two machine-harvest cotton planting patterns (T1: the cotton planting model with one film, two drip tapes and six rows; T2: the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows), and a conventional planting mode (T3: the cotton planting model with one film, two drip tapes and four rows) as a control. RESULTS: Our results showed that the heat preservation and warming effects of the cotton planting model with one film, two drip tapes and six rows and the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows were better than that of the conventional planting mode. Soil temperature under the mulching film quickly increased and slowly decreased, which was beneficial to the early growth and development of cotton. The mean soil moisture content of the 0-60 cm soil layer in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows was significantly higher than the other two treatments at the middle and late stage of cotton growth (90 days after sowing (DAS) and 135 DAS). Moreover, the water holding capacity of the middle and upper part of the tillage layer in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows was the best. At the medium cotton growth stage, the main root layer in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows formed a desalination zone. At the late cotton growth stage, the soil salinity content of the 0-60 cm soil layer showed that the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows was the lowest, the cotton planting model with one film, two drip tapes and six rows was the highest, and the conventional planting pattern was in the middle. Among these three modes, the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows was more efficient in controlling soil salt accumulation. The agronomic traits and cotton quality in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows were better than that for the other two treatments. Compared with the other treatments, the cotton yield in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows increased by 6.15% and 11.0% and 8.1% and 12.3%, in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and WUE increased by 17.4% and 22.7% and 20.9% and 22.8%, in 2017 and 2018 respectively. In conclusion, the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows can be recommended for machine-harvest cotton planting for arid areas in Xinjiang, considering water conservation and improving cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both six row cotton modes provided better soil warming than conventional planting.

Treatment
one film, two drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
heat preservation and warming effectse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
conventional planting modee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the heat preservation and warming effects of the cotton planting model with one film, two drip tapes and six rows and the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows were better than that of the conventional planting mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three tape six row mode had significantly higher mid and late stage soil moisture.

Treatment
one film, three drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
mean soil moisture content of the 0-60 cm soil layere0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
middle and late stage of cotton growth (90 days after sowing (DAS) and 135 DAS)e0
Comparator
other two treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean soil moisture content of the 0-60 cm soil layer in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows was significantly higher than the other two treatments at the middle and late stage of cotton growth (90 days after sowing (DAS) and 135 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three tapes gave the best water holding capacity in the middle and upper tillage layer.

Treatment
one film, three drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
water holding capacity of the middle and upper part of the tillage layere0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the water holding capacity of the middle and upper part of the tillage layer in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1475 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A desalination zone formed in the main root layer under the three tape mode.

Organ / stage
main root layere0
Treatment
one film, three drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
formed a desalination zonee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the main root layer in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows formed a desalination zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three tapes had the lowest late stage soil salinity.

Treatment
one film, three drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
soil salinity content of the 0-60 cm soil layere0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil salinity content of the 0-60 cm soil layer showed that the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows was the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two tapes with six rows had the highest late stage soil salinity.

Treatment
one film, two drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
soil salinity contente1
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
conventional planting patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton planting model with one film, two drip tapes and six rows was the highest, and the conventional planting pattern was in the middle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1959 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil salinity content of the 0-60 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three tape mode improved agronomic traits and cotton quality.

Treatment
one film, three drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
agronomic traits and cotton qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other two treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The agronomic traits and cotton quality in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows were better than that for the other two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2115–2279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three tape mode increased cotton yield versus other modes in 2017 and 2018.

Treatment
one film, three drip tapes and six rowse0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.15% and 11.0% and 8.1% and 12.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton yield in the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows increased by 6.15% and 11.0% and 8.1% and 12.3%, in 2017 and 2018, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2317–2487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three tape mode increased cotton water use efficiency in 2017 and 2018.

Treatment
three drip tapese1
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.4% and 22.7% and 20.9% and 22.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE increased by 17.4% and 22.7% and 20.9% and 22.8%, in 2017 and 2018 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2493–2576 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“one film, three drip tapes and six rows was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1475 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The three tape six row configuration was recommended for machine harvest cotton in arid Xinjiang.

Outcome
cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rowse0
Setting
Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton planting model with one film, three drip tapes and six rows can be recommended for machine-harvest cotton planting for arid areas in Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2593–2745 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 110 positive, 21 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.