Paper · 2021 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response of bread wheat and nutrient removal with new micronutrient molecules fertilization

ANAND SINGH; U P SHAHI; B P DHYANI; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment entitled effect of newly formulated micronutrient fertilizers on crop performance, economic and nutrients uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was conducted during rabi 2017-18 and 2018-19 at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. The recommended doses of N, P and K were applied @ 120 N: 60 P2O5: 40 K2O kg/ha in combination with different micronutrients fertilizers of Zn, Mn and B. The pooled data of experiment revealed that the growth and yield attributes including yield were maximum in T11 (RDF+ soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite) while the cost of cultivation was minimum in T12. The study consisting of different combination of micronutrients sources indicated that highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield (4.25 t/ha), straw yield (5.89 t/ha), net returns (54870 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.12) were recorded with T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite) followed by treatment T12 (T1 + foliar application of Zn HEDP + EDTA Mn + DOT). The uptake of zinc, manganese and boron was increased due to their application in combination with NPK either soil or foliar application. All the parameters including economics were minimum under T1. Appropriate combination of zinc, manganese and boron with recommended dose of primary nutrients for wheat crop was beneficial in every parameters including output.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave maximum growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
T11 (RDF+ soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite)e1
Outcome
growth and yield attributes including yielde1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth and yield attributes including yield were maximum in T11 (RDF+ soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 had the minimum cultivation cost.

Treatment
T12e1
Outcome
cost of cultivatione1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“the cost of cultivation was minimum in T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 yielded 4.25 t/ha grain, the highest reported.

Treatment
T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite)e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.25 t/hae1
Comparator
treatment T12e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield (4.25 t/ha), straw yield (5.89 t/ha), net returns (54870 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.12) were recorded with T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite) followed by treatment T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 yielded 5.89 t/ha straw, the highest reported.

Treatment
T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite)e1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.89 t/hae1
Comparator
treatment T12e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield (4.25 t/ha), straw yield (5.89 t/ha), net returns (54870 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.12) were recorded with T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite) followed by treatment T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave the highest net returns, 54870 ₹/ha.

Treatment
T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite)e1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
54870 ₹/hae1
Comparator
treatment T12e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield (4.25 t/ha), straw yield (5.89 t/ha), net returns (54870 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.12) were recorded with T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite) followed by treatment T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.12.

Treatment
T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite)e1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.12e1
Comparator
treatment T12e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield (4.25 t/ha), straw yield (5.89 t/ha), net returns (54870 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.12) were recorded with T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite) followed by treatment T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined micronutrient application with NPK increased zinc, manganese and boron uptake.

Treatment
application in combination with NPK either soil or foliar applicatione1
Outcome
uptake of zinc, manganese and borone1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“The uptake of zinc, manganese and boron was increased due to their application in combination with NPK either soil or foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had minimum performance and economic parameters.

Treatment
T1e1
Outcome
All the parameters including economicse1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the parameters including economics were minimum under T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1272 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combining zinc, manganese and boron with recommended primary nutrients was beneficial for wheat output.

Outcome
Appropriate combination of zinc, manganese and boron with recommended dose of primary nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Appropriate combination of zinc, manganese and boron with recommended dose of primary nutrients for wheat crop was beneficial in every parameters including output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1436 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

etidronic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.