Paper · 2000 · Plant Pathology

Biocontrol of the pathogen Phytophthora parasitica by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is a consequence of effects on infection loci

C. Vigo; J. R. Norman; J. E. Hooker

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
182
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The impact of colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseae on tomato root necrosis caused by the soil‐borne pathogen Phytophthora parasitica was investigated. Studies in situ permitted infection loci to be identified and the effects of the AMF on numbers to be elucidated. Effects were significant and, 7 and 16 days after inoculation with zoospores of the pathogen, roots of plants colonized by the AMF had 39% and 30%, respectively, fewer infection loci than those that were not. Concurrent studies of the rate of spread of necrosis within roots showed no changes caused by the AMF. At harvest, 26 days following inoculation with the pathogen, 61% of roots of noncolonized plants were necrotic compared with only 31% in AMF‐colonized plants. It is concluded that effects on numbers of infection loci are one mechanism via which AMF achieve biocontrol of this pathogen in tomato. Measures of the effects of the AMF on root system architecture suggest that no significant changes occur and are thus not the reasons for the reduction in infection loci. The implications of these data for agricultural practice and biocontrol research are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonization by Glomus mosseae reduced Phytophthora parasitica infection loci on tomato roots by 39% at 7 days after inoculation

Treatment
colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Phytophthora parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaet0pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infection locie1
Direction
fewere1
Value
39%e1
Qualifier
7 and 16 days after inoculatione1
Comparator
those that were note1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of the pathogen Phytophthora parasitica by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseae on tomato root necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effects were significant and, 7 and 16 days after inoculation with zoospores of the pathogen, roots of plants colonized by the AMF had 39% and 30%, respectively, fewer infection loci than those that were not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonization by Glomus mosseae reduced Phytophthora parasitica infection loci on tomato roots by 30% at 16 days after inoculation

Treatment
colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Phytophthora parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaet0pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infection locie1
Direction
fewere1
Value
30%e1
Qualifier
16 days after inoculatione1
Comparator
those that were note1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of the pathogen Phytophthora parasitica by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseae on tomato root necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effects were significant and, 7 and 16 days after inoculation with zoospores of the pathogen, roots of plants colonized by the AMF had 39% and 30%, respectively, fewer infection loci than those that were not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization did not change the rate of spread of Phytophthora parasitica necrosis within tomato roots

Organ / stage
rootse2
Treatment
the AMFe2
Interactor
Phytophthora parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaet0pathogen
Outcome
rate of spread of necrosis within rootse2
Direction
no changese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of the pathogen Phytophthora parasitica by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseae on tomato root necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Concurrent studies of the rate of spread of necrosis within roots showed no changes caused by the AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization lowered the proportion of necrotic tomato roots from 61% to 31% at harvest after Phytophthora parasitica inoculation

Organ / stage
rootse3
Treatment
colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Phytophthora parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaet0pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
necrotice3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
61%e3
Qualifier
31%e3
Comparator
noncolonized plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of the pathogen Phytophthora parasitica by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseae on tomato root necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“At harvest, 26 days following inoculation with the pathogen, 61% of roots of noncolonized plants were necrotic compared with only 31% in AMF‐colonized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–768 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer infection loci is one mechanism by which AMF achieve biocontrol of Phytophthora parasitica in tomato

Treatment
AMFe4
Outcome
numbers of infection locie4
Qualifier
one mechanism via which AMF achieve biocontrole4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“It is concluded that effects on numbers of infection loci are one mechanism via which AMF achieve biocontrol of this pathogen in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization did not significantly change root system architecture of tomato

Treatment
the AMFe5
Outcome
root system architecturee5
Direction
no significant changese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Measures of the effects of the AMF on root system architecture suggest that no significant changes occur and are thus not the reasons for the reduction in infection loci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1076 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseae on tomato root necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑

infection · Phytophthora nicotianae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 127 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

mycorrhiza · Phytophthora nicotianae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.