Paper · 1973 · New Phytologist

EFFECT OF ENDOGONE MYCORRHIZA ON PLANT GROWTH V. INFLUENCE OF INFECTION ON THE MULTIPLICATION OF VIRUSES IN TOMATO, PETUNIA AND STRAWBERRY

M. J. DAFT; B. O. OKUSANYA

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The effects of mycorrhizal infection on the production of three viruses in three hosts were examined. In tomato, the multiplication of tomato aucuba mosaic virus was increased and the amount of potato virus × produced depended on the stage of the mycorrhizal development. The amount of extractable arabis mosaic virus from petunia and strawberry plants was greater from mycorrhizal than from non‐mycorrhizal plants. These results are attributed to the higher levels of phosphate contained in mycorrhizal plants, because enhanced virus production could also be achieved in non‐mycorrhizal plants given various levels of soluble phosphate. These results are discussed in relation to other three‐membered systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection increased tomato aucuba mosaic virus multiplication in tomato.

Treatment
mycorrhizal infectione1
Interactor
tomato aucuba mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
multiplication of tomato aucuba mosaic viruse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In tomato, the multiplication of tomato aucuba mosaic virus was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“effects of mycorrhizal infection on the production of three viruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato virus multiplication in tomato depended on mycorrhizal development stage.

Organ / stage
stage of the mycorrhizal developmente0
Interactor
potato virus ×Potato virus Xe0pathogen
Outcome
amount of potato virus × producede0
Qualifier
stage of the mycorrhizal developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of potato virus × produced depended on the stage of the mycorrhizal development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“In tomato, the multiplication of tomato aucuba mosaic virus was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal petunia plants yielded more extractable arabis mosaic virus than non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniae0
Treatment
mycorrhizale0
Interactor
arabis mosaic virusArabis mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
amount of extractable arabis mosaic viruse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
non‐mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of extractable arabis mosaic virus from petunia and strawberry plants was greater from mycorrhizal than from non‐mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal strawberry plants yielded more extractable arabis mosaic virus than non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
mycorrhizale0
Interactor
arabis mosaic virusArabis mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
amount of extractable arabis mosaic viruse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
non‐mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of extractable arabis mosaic virus from petunia and strawberry plants was greater from mycorrhizal than from non‐mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–422 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plants had higher phosphate levels.

Taxon
TOMATO, PETUNIA AND STRAWBERRYt0
Treatment
mycorrhizale0
Outcome
levels of phosphatee0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“higher levels of phosphate contained in mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO, PETUNIA AND STRAWBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble phosphate increased virus production in non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
TOMATO, PETUNIA AND STRAWBERRYt0
Treatment
various levels of soluble phosphatee0
Outcome
virus productione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced virus production could also be achieved in non‐mycorrhizal plants given various levels of soluble phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO, PETUNIA AND STRAWBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–138 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute enhanced viral production in mycorrhizal plants to their higher phosphate levels.

Taxon
TOMATO, PETUNIA AND STRAWBERRYt0
Compound
phosphatee0
Outcome
enhanced virus productione1
Qualifier
higher levelse0

Verbatim

e0

“These results are attributed to the higher levels of phosphate contained in mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–518 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhanced virus production could also be achieved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO, PETUNIA AND STRAWBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–138 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

101 papers: 80 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Petunia (petunia)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

infection · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 29 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.