Paper · 2021 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

THE GROWTH, PHOTOSYNTHETIC PARAMETERS AND NITROGEN STATUS OF BASIL, CORIANDER AND OREGANO GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LED LIGHT SPECTRA

Bożena Matysiak; Artur Kowalski

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Growth, morphological parameters, photosynthetic performance and nitrogen status were investigated in leafy herbs grown in light-limited time in a greenhouse under different light spectra emitted by LEDs. Fluorescence-based sensors that detect crop N status and maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II were used in this study. Four light treatments with the ratio of Red, Blue and White LEDs including 1) R40 + B50 + W10, 2) R70 + B20 + W10, 3) R70 + B20 + W10 + Far-Red and 4) White LEDs as control were used in this study. Dominant red light and/or white LED lights at 200 µmol m–2 s–1 at plant level and a 12 h photoperiod provided the most favourable conditions for plant growth and development compared to a high proportion of blue light (R40 + B50 + W10). However, plants grown under a high proportion of blue light had a higher chlorophyll index and nitrogen balance index (NBI) than under dominant red light treatments. Our study indicates the significant potential of fluorescence-based sensors in photobiology research as well as in the production of leafy herbs under LED lights.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant red and/or white LED light provided more favourable conditions for growth and development of basil, coriander and oregano than a high proportion of blue light.

Treatment
Dominant red light and/or white LED lightse1
Outcome
plant growth and developmente2
Direction
most favourablee2
Comparator
a high proportion of blue lighte2
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BASIL, CORIANDER AND OREGANO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“in a greenhouse under different light spectra emitted by LEDs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–203 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dominant red light and/or white LED lights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–578 · show in text ↑
e2

“provided the most favourable conditions for plant growth and development compared to a high proportion of blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants under a high proportion of blue light had higher chlorophyll index and nitrogen balance index than under dominant red light treatments.

Treatment
a high proportion of blue lighte3
Outcome
chlorophyll index and nitrogen balance indexe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
dominant red light treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BASIL, CORIANDER AND OREGANO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“plants grown under a high proportion of blue light had a higher chlorophyll index and nitrogen balance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–890 · show in text ↑
e4

“than under dominant red light treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–937 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study indicates significant potential of fluorescence-based sensors in photobiology research and leafy herb production under LED lights.

Outcome
potential of fluorescencee5

Not reportedComparator

Schema note from the model: conclusion without a stated comparator or value

Verbatim

e5

“Our study indicates the significant potential of fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1000 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

light · growth · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 28 positive, 9 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.