Abstract
Mung bean is the one of the nutritious commodity bean plants, however the productivity of mung bean production in Indonesia is relatively low because of pests or pathogens, such as the mung bean weevil ( Callosobruchus maculatus). Radiation is one of techniques used to control pests or pathogens in crops. This research aimed to determine whether radiation in certain doses (GR-20 and GR-50) could protect and eradicate the mung bean weevil without affecting the quality of mung bean seeds. The following procedure were : radiosensitivity testing of irradiated seeds ( GR- 20 and GR-50), analyzing the data of radiation treatment before and after infested weevil and seeds quality testing. The results showed that the figure of adult population development in irradiated and in non -irradiated seeds (Figure 2) had no significant different, the radiation protection test showed that neither a GR-20 (222,20 Gray) nor a GR-50 (608,80 Gray) had an effect on adult population development, while the radiation eradication test showed that a GR-20 dose was lethal dose to the eggs of the mung bean weevil. The irradiation seed treatment had no effect on the quality of seeds, based on the water content and protein content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Adult weevil population development did not significantly differ between irradiated and non-irradiated seeds.
- Taxon
- mung bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- irradiatede0
- Interactor
- mung bean weevilt0pest
- Outcome
- adult population developmente0
- Direction
- no significant differente0
- Comparator
- non -irradiated seedse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“adult population development in irradiated and in non -irradiated seeds (Figure 2) had no significant different”
t0“mung bean weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.) and the quality of mung bean seed (Phaseolus radiatus L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
GR-20 did not affect adult weevil population development in the protection test.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- GR-20 (222,20 Gray)e0
- Interactor
- mung bean weevilt0pest
- Outcome
- adult population developmente0
- Direction
- had an effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neither a GR-20 (222,20 Gray) nor a GR-50 (608,80 Gray) had an effect on adult population development”
t0“mung bean weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.) and the quality of mung bean seed (Phaseolus radiatus L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
GR-50 did not affect adult weevil population development in the protection test.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- GR-50 (608,80 Gray)e0
- Interactor
- mung bean weevilt0pest
- Outcome
- adult population developmente0
- Direction
- had an effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neither a GR-20 (222,20 Gray) nor a GR-50 (608,80 Gray) had an effect on adult population development”
t0“mung bean weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.) and the quality of mung bean seed (Phaseolus radiatus L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
GR-20 was lethal to mung bean weevil eggs in the eradication test.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- GR-20e0
- Interactor
- mung bean weevile0pest
- Outcome
- eggs of the mung bean weevile0
- Direction
- lethale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a GR-20 dose was lethal dose to the eggs of the mung bean weevil”
t0“quality of mung bean seed (Phaseolus radiatus L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation did not affect seed water or protein content.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- irradiation seed treatmente0
- Outcome
- water content and protein contente0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irradiation seed treatment had no effect on the quality of seeds, based on the water content and protein content.”
t0“quality of mung bean seed (Phaseolus radiatus L.)”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
radiation · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
seed treatment · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.