Abstract
Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays, Ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS), Nitrosoguanidine (NG), Maleic hydrazide (MH) and their combined treatments were studied in greengram. The percentage of lethality, pollen sterility, frequency of chlorophyll mutations, mutagenic effectiveness, mutagenic efficiency and mutation rate of each mutagen and their combination treatments were estimated to determine the mutagenic effect of these mutagens and their combinations. The result indicated that the values of mutagenic effectiveness gradually decreased with increases in dose/concentration of mutagens. Among all mutagens, NG exhibited as the most effective mutagen. The lower dose of NG (0.005%) was recorded as the most effective and efficient among all mutagenic treatments. Among combined treatments, gamma rays with NG were found as more effective than other mutagenic combinations whereas gamma rays with EMS were found as the more efficient mutagenic combination. Among all mutagens, the maximum mutation rate based on lethality and pollen sterility observed in gamma rays treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Mutagenic effectiveness decreased as mutagen dose or concentration increased.
- Taxon
- greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- mutagense0
- Outcome
- mutagenic effectivenesse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the values of mutagenic effectiveness gradually decreased with increases in dose/concentration of mutagens”
t0“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
t1“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrosoguanidine was the most effective mutagen.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- NGe0
- Outcome
- mutagenic effectivenesst1
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- all mutagense0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among all mutagens, NG exhibited as the most effective mutagen”
t0“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
t1“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 0.005% dose of NG was the most effective and efficient treatment.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- NG (0.005%)e0
- Outcome
- effective and efficiente0
- Direction
- most effective and efficiente0
- Comparator
- all mutagenic treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lower dose of NG (0.005%) was recorded as the most effective and efficient among all mutagenic treatments”
t0“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
t1“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamma rays with NG were more effective than other combinations.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- gamma rays with NGe0
- Outcome
- effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- other mutagenic combinationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among combined treatments, gamma rays with NG were found as more effective than other mutagenic combinations”
t0“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
t1“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamma rays with EMS were the more efficient mutagenic combination.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- gamma rays with EMSe0
- Outcome
- efficiente0
- Direction
- more efficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gamma rays with EMS were found as the more efficient mutagenic combination”
t0“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
t1“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamma ray treatments had the maximum mutation rate based on lethality and pollen sterility.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- gamma rays treatmentse0
- Outcome
- mutation rate based on lethality and pollen sterilitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- all mutagense1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum mutation rate based on lethality and pollen sterility observed in gamma rays treatments”
t0“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
t1“Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl Methane Sulphonate, Nitrosoguanidine, Maleic Hydrazide and their Combination in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e1“Among all mutagens, the maximum mutation rate based on lethality and pollen sterility observed in gamma rays treatments”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.