Abstract
The field experiments were carried out in Sakha Agric. Res. Station at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, during 2018 and 2019 seasons to study the effect of Nano-fertilizers and its concentrations on growth, yield and its components and fiber quality to increasing productivity of cotton to Giza 96 variety. The design of experiment was a split- plot with 4 replications. The main plots included the Nano. Compounds (Nano- Silica, Nano- Iron, Nano-Copper and Nano- Zinc) and the sub plots involved three concentrations (250, 500 and 1000 ppm ). Foliar spraying three times (at squaring, initiation of flowering and 2 weeks after flowering). The obtained results were as follows: Nano-fertilizers and fertilizer concentrations and their interaction had significant effect on plant height, No. of fruiting branches /p, first fruiting node, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index, and seed cotton yield/fed. but gave insignificant effect on lint percentage, fiber parameters (fiber length, uniformity %, strength and micronaire reading). Spring Nano-Si significantly increased plant height, No. of fruiting branches /p., seed index and seed cotton yield/fed. and its components ( No. of bolls/plant and boll weight) as compared with the other Nano- fertilizers (Fe, Cu and Zn). The high concentration of Nano-fertilizers 1000 ppm gave the good values of growth and yield and yield components. Spring Nano-Si with 1000 ppm fertilizer concentration gave the good values of growth and yield. It could be concluded that sparing Nano Si with high concentration 1000 ppm three times gave high productivity of Giza 96 cotton variety under the conditions of Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Nano fertilizers, concentration and their interaction significantly affected cotton growth and yield traits.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Nano-fertilizers and fertilizer concentrationse0
- Outcome
- plant height, No. of fruiting branches /p, first fruiting nodee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nano-fertilizers and fertilizer concentrations and their interaction had significant effect on plant height, No. of fruiting branches /p, first fruiting node, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index, and seed cotton yield/fed.”
t0“Cotton Variety Giza 96”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano fertilizers had no significant effect on lint percentage and fiber parameters.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Nano-fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- lint percentage, fiber parameterse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but gave insignificant effect on lint percentage, fiber parameters (fiber length, uniformity %, strength and micronaire reading)”
t0“Cotton Variety Giza 96”
e1“Nano-fertilizers and fertilizer concentrations and their interaction”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano silica increased plant height, fruiting branches and seed index compared with other nano fertilizers.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Nano-Sie0
- Outcome
- plant height, No. of fruiting branches /p., seed indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- other Nano- fertilizers (Fe, Cu and Zn)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spring Nano-Si significantly increased plant height, No. of fruiting branches /p., seed index and seed cotton yield/fed. and its components ( No. of bolls/plant and boll weight) as compared with the other Nano- fertilizers (Fe, Cu and Zn)”
t0“Cotton Variety Giza 96”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano silica increased seed cotton yield and its boll components compared with other nano fertilizers.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Nano-Sie0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yield/fed. and its components ( No. of bolls/plant and boll weight)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- other Nano- fertilizers (Fe, Cu and Zn)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spring Nano-Si significantly increased plant height, No. of fruiting branches /p., seed index and seed cotton yield/fed. and its components ( No. of bolls/plant and boll weight) as compared with the other Nano- fertilizers (Fe, Cu and Zn)”
t0“Cotton Variety Giza 96”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1000 ppm nano fertilizer concentration gave favorable growth and yield values.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Nano-fertilizers 1000 ppme0
- Outcome
- good values of growth and yield and yield componentse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The high concentration of Nano-fertilizers 1000 ppm gave the good values of growth and yield and yield components”
t0“Cotton Variety Giza 96”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano silica at 1000 ppm gave favorable growth and yield values.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Nano-Si with 1000 ppm fertilizer concentratione0
- Outcome
- good values of growth and yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spring Nano-Si with 1000 ppm fertilizer concentration gave the good values of growth and yield”
t0“Cotton Variety Giza 96”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend three applications of nano silica at 1000 ppm for high Giza 96 cotton productivity in Kafr El-Sheikh.
Verbatim
e0“sparing Nano Si with high concentration 1000 ppm three times gave high productivity of Giza 96 cotton variety under the conditions of Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.