Paper · 2018 · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)

Proceedings: 2nd International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics: RESPONSE OF COTTON TO FERTILIZING LEVELS IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOUTHERN BULGARIA

Panayotova, Galina; Kostadinova, Svetla; Pleskuta, Lubov; et al.

18
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different application rates of nitrogen and phosphorus on seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions. The soil type was Leached vertisols. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. Single and combined nitrogen as NH4NO3 in rates 0; 80; 120 and 160 kg.ha-1 and phosphorus in rates 0; 80 and 120 kg.ha-1 were tested. The year conditions had greatest share in the total variation of the factors – 67.4 %. The N influence on seed-cotton yield was 13.0 % and of phosphorus - 0.45 % of total variation. No significant differences in the total seed-cotton yield occurred as a function of the NP interaction. The nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers used in cotton production remain important, as N has a decisive influence, while phosphorus has less effect. Under the influence of N fertilization, the total seed-cotton yield significantly increased by 26.6-32.9 % compared to the check (1.32 t.ha-1), and under fertilization P120– by 2.9 %. An alone phosphorous fertilization was not cost-effective agronomic activity. Application of increasing NP rates in different rates showed good economic results regarding the yield. The maximum effective yield and net return from cotton cultiar Darmi can be secured by application of N120-160P80-120 to cotton crop at Central South Bulgaria - 26.6-37.8 % more than the unfertilized. Total average dry biomass at maturity was 5.51 t.ha-1. The total dry matter was more than the unfertilized by 24.0; 40.8 and 62.8 % at N80, N120 and N160 respectively. The phosphorous fertilization increased the yield of biomass by 7.6 % at P80 and by 3.4 % at P120. The year conditions had strong effect on seed-cotton yield and total biomass. The main reason for the high yields in 2014 for all tested rates, as well as the control, was the very good combination of temperature and rainfall during the vegetation period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased seed-cotton yield by 26.6-32.9% relative to the check in cotton grown at Chirpan, Bulgaria.

Treatment
N fertilizatione1
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26.6-32.9 %e1
Comparator
the checke1
Setting
Chirpan, Bulgariae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the influence of N fertilization, the total seed-cotton yield significantly increased by 26.6-32.9 % compared to the check (1.32 t.ha-1), and under fertilization P120– by 2.9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization at P120 increased seed-cotton yield by 2.9% relative to the check.

Treatment
fertilization P120e1
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
2.9 %e1
Comparator
the checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the influence of N fertilization, the total seed-cotton yield significantly increased by 26.6-32.9 % compared to the check (1.32 t.ha-1), and under fertilization P120– by 2.9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference in total seed-cotton yield resulted from the NP interaction.

Treatment
NP interactione2
Outcome
total seed-cotton yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e2

“No significant differences in the total seed-cotton yield occurred as a function of the NP interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–832 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen influence explained 13.0% of total variation in seed-cotton yield.

Treatment
Ne3
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde3
Value
13.0 %e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e3

“The N influence on seed-cotton yield was 13.0 % and of phosphorus - 0.45 % of total variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–728 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus influence explained 0.45% of total variation in seed-cotton yield.

Treatment
phosphoruse3
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde3
Value
0.45 %e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e3

“The N influence on seed-cotton yield was 13.0 % and of phosphorus - 0.45 % of total variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–728 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions had the greatest share (67.4%) of total variation of the factors.

Treatment
year conditionse4
Outcome
share in the total variation of the factorse4
Value
67.4 %e4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e4

“The year conditions had greatest share in the total variation of the factors – 67.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–633 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization alone was not cost-effective for cotton.

Treatment
alone phosphorous fertilizatione6
Outcome
cost-effective agronomic activitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e6

“An alone phosphorous fertilization was not cost-effective agronomic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NP rates showed good economic results regarding cotton yield.

Treatment
increasing NP ratese7
Outcome
economic results regarding the yielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of increasing NP rates in different rates showed good economic results regarding the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1347 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of N120-160P80-120 is recommended to secure maximum effective yield and net return of cultivar Darmi at Central South Bulgaria.

Material
Darmie1
Treatment
application of N120-160P80-120e1
Outcome
maximum effective yield and net returne1
Setting
Central South Bulgariae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum effective yield and net return from cotton cultiar Darmi can be secured by application of N120-160P80-120 to cotton crop at Central South Bulgaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of N120-160P80-120 gave cotton yield 26.6-37.8% above the unfertilized control.

Treatment
application of N120-160P80-120e1
Outcome
maximum effective yield and net returne1
Direction
moree2
Value
26.6-37.8 %e2
Comparator
unfertilizede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum effective yield and net return from cotton cultiar Darmi can be secured by application of N120-160P80-120 to cotton crop at Central South Bulgaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1507 · show in text ↑
e2

“26.6-37.8 % more than the unfertilized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1548 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total average dry biomass at maturity of cotton was 5.51 t/ha.

Outcome
Total average dry biomass at maturitye1
Value
5.51 t.ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total average dry biomass at maturity was 5.51 t.ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter was 24.0% higher than the unfertilized control at N80.

Treatment
N80e1
Outcome
total dry mattere1
Direction
moree1
Value
24.0e1
Comparator
unfertilizede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total dry matter was more than the unfertilized by 24.0; 40.8 and 62.8 % at N80, N120 and N160 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter was 40.8% higher than the unfertilized control at N120.

Treatment
N120e1
Outcome
total dry mattere1
Direction
moree1
Value
40.8e1
Comparator
unfertilizede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total dry matter was more than the unfertilized by 24.0; 40.8 and 62.8 % at N80, N120 and N160 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter was 62.8% higher than the unfertilized control at N160.

Treatment
N160e1
Outcome
total dry mattere1
Direction
moree1
Value
62.8 %e1
Comparator
unfertilizede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total dry matter was more than the unfertilized by 24.0; 40.8 and 62.8 % at N80, N120 and N160 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization at P80 increased biomass yield by 7.6%.

Treatment
P80e1
Outcome
yield of biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.6 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“The phosphorous fertilization increased the yield of biomass by 7.6 % at P80 and by 3.4 % at P120”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization at P120 increased biomass yield by 3.4%.

Treatment
P120e1
Outcome
yield of biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.4 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“The phosphorous fertilization increased the yield of biomass by 7.6 % at P80 and by 3.4 % at P120”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1815 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions had a strong effect on cotton seed yield and total biomass.

Treatment
year conditionse1
Outcome
seed-cotton yield and total biomasse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“The year conditions had strong effect on seed-cotton yield and total biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1893 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The high cotton yields in 2014 were explained by a very good combination of temperature and rainfall during the vegetation period.

Outcome
high yields in 2014e1
Qualifier
the very good combination of temperature and rainfall during the vegetation periode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-cotton yield and total biomass of cotton (G. hirsutum L.), grown during the period 2012-2014 in Chirpan, Bulgaria, in crop-rotation with durum wheat under non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–295 · show in text ↑
e1

“The main reason for the high yields in 2014 for all tested rates, as well as the control, was the very good combination of temperature and rainfall during the vegetation period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–2071 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.